Thread

Replies (49)

My side? Again I’m not in a cult. I don’t have a side. I do recognize that you will never stop spam, and that filters create more issues than they solve and push spam into worse areas of the system. You are also ignoring over a decade of cyberpunk knowledge around open decentralized protocols and how the legal system deals with them. As soon as you create a system where node operators can absolutely control what makes it onto the network the expectation by the state will be that you will comply with their demands. You tread a dangerous path on your righteous crusade.
Compromised Core devs deliberately allowed inscription spam, retard.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
See the compromised Core devs who rejected Luke's PR that fixes inscription spam. They are the bad actors (the NACKers) They revealed themselves with their public comments on OP_RETRUN being dishonest and manipulative. The guys that ACKed are the good guys we have. image https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187 Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →
As node runners we intend to preserve Bitcoin's primary usecase (money, not JPGs, not "data"). The current spam is obfuscated and fragmented (and Core is responsible for much of it by REFUSING to fix Inscriptions exploit bug). 100k OP_RETURN will allow for high fidelity CSAM images in an inmutable blockchain. We did not sign up for that crap, so forgive me if we are playing defense here by trying to preserve Bitcoin.
Watching bitcoiners invoke the states arguments against encryption during this debate is mind boggling. This virtue signally doesn’t work on most of us, why are you mugging for the normies cameras? He didn’t offer a bug fix. He offered filtering. As we all know filtering won’t stop the inscriptions because it will only take a single pool to mine these transactions regardless of the filters. If you succeed in stopping all the pools one will emerge that will have a revenue stream that no others will and will pull in ever more hash rate as profit seeking is what underpins the entire bitcoin network. This is highly centralizing and far worse for bitcoin than some data you don’t like.
More retarded propaganda and nonsense from you? I am not surprised. 1. Filters work. That is why MARA stopped mining transactions with 0.1sat/vB fees. image 2. Ocean is fixing centralized mining with DATUM - Decentralized Alternative Templates for Universal Mining "DATUM was born out of a need to restore Bitcoin mining to its decentralized rootsβ€”a time when miners truly embodied the role of building the blockchain by constructing block templates and submitting them to the network."
1. You don’t understand incentives. Not mining low cost transactions has nothing to do with mining higher fee β€œspam”. 2. Datum won’t solve for miners who specifically choose to mine spam because they want to make more money. All datum does is make sure miners have better control over what they include in their blocks regardless of what the pool would want. A pool of miners who want to mine garbage for the money will outcompete all other miners. Your solution just accelerates the issue.
Bitcoin is designed to incentivize self interest. I would generally agree that bitcoin creates environments for long term thinking, the competitive low margin nature of mining will continuously create environments for immediate profit motives to outweigh the long term health of the chain. It’s a free network. So run the node you want, just remember that freedom cuts both ways. Your rhetorical style besides being childish and cultish, is so dripping with self righteous fervor that I think it will be a net negative for Bitcoin regardless of how these node wars ultimately turn out.
What is the difference between "exposing information" and trying to draw attention to the things you share and are interested in? If your list is so objectively important and interesting, does it upset you at all that you have to be the one to repost it yourself? Nobody else cares as much as you do about this list, and the fact that you make no attempt to adapt or improve your posts is sad. As is the fact that you insist on adding your words to all of these. The fact that you insist on spoon-feeding to everybody what they should be thinking about each of these posts is very condescending and insecure. You should post your notes more like I post my own notes. I always try to make original posts, even when I'm discussing a topic for the 100th time. If I think there is a problem with something someone says, I'd rather try to get people's view on it without injecting my own thoughts. Heck, if I see something wrong, I always try to ask people questions rather than spending all my time constantly proving how bad that thing is. That's why I've asked you a handful of questions so far.
See? Now you get it. You are tailoring your reply to the words of the person you are replying to. I don't think there's anything wrong with telling people to copy oneself. If a person chooses to act a certain way, then they probably have a reason for it. By arguing with others about the best way to post, they get to share that reason, and when people share their reasoning, everyone can benefit. I notice you didn't answer the questions I asked you. Here's another I'm wondering about: do you think it's bad to look down on people? Also, do you have a question you want to ask me?
There's a really cool experiment you can do in a classroom. Fill up a jar with pennies, then have students write their guess for how much is in the jar. Take all the guesses and average them. Most individual guess will be way off, but the average will be very close to truth. If a community is changing preferences, that is a very good indication that the truth of the situation has changed, regardless of each individual's estimations.
User's avatar npub1s33s...252p
Bitcoin Core 30 Malware Coming Friday
View quoted note →
My fellow 80IQ plebs: - Bitcoin is about to go through one of the biggest attacks this Friday and I want you to keep an eye on following group of fake bitcoiners/clowns to make sure you are super toxic towards them and never ever forget to treat them worse than your worst enemy since these clowns are about to ruin our last chance to save humanity from slavery. - Clowns who immediately start running shitcoin core V30 (aka malware) - Simpfluencers who talk about all of the trending things happening in bitcoin but never talk about core vs knots debate -Simpfluencers who are pro malware and do everything possible to prove that malware is better than @npub13rhy...cgea -Simpfluencers who subtly support malware so, they don't get the heat from 80IQ plebs (e.g. @ODELL, @Marty Bent) -Shitcoin Core devs who actually put us in this position -Spammers -Spam apologists -Fake bitcoiners who attacked hardworking noderunners in the past YOU SHOULD BE TREATING ALL OF THESE CLOWNS AS A GLOBALISTS OR CENTRAL PLANNERS OF BITCOIN PERIOD If you have not started running knots and mining with @OCEAN please do it asap (if possible). THE NEXT FEW DAYS/MONTHS WILL BE MAKE OR BREAK MOMENT FOR BITCOIN SO PLEASE DO NOT STOP BEING TOXIC BITCOIN MAXIMALIST #RunKnots #ObliterateCore #StayToxic View quoted note β†’