A truth I was surprised to discover:
Most people want slavery. They just want to be comfortable. And the moment a little bit of freedom causes discomfort, they rush back to their cage.
Then to delude themselves because they canโt accept that reality, they label all things uncomfortable as โslaveryโ and all things comfortable as โfreedom.โ Convincing themselves that because their cage is โnice and safe,โ this means they are actually free.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (70)
I first learned of what youโre talking about when I learned of the Christmas club.
The mentality of this โฆ how do you change these bad habits, the correct incentives, yes but itโs so easy to deceive.
Ai quick summary:
The Christmas Club was first introduced by Pennsylvania banker Merkel Landis in 1909. It was marketed as a way for customers to save gradually for holiday spending, but in reality, it served the banks far more than the savers.
Customers locked in small deposits all year, which the bank could lend out or invest, earning returns. If a customer needed their money early, theyโd face penaltiesโlosing interest or paying fees. So banks got cheap, predictable capital, while customers got restricted access to their own funds and little to no real yield.
It wasnโt financial empowermentโit was behavior control, wrapped in tinsel.
The Christmas club problem
nevent1qqsqellr9pyjg5hgrz2rf8hz8axz9qczeyj3u5c2jxk2ap0hp3w22xqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgjz9djw
Biblical slavery was quite comfortable. The master who told you where to be in the morning and what to do was also the master responsible for housing you
In the modern world we just separate the two masters as the corporation and the bank
And then we spend all our time fretting about anything that can cause a mismatch between unemployment levels and mortgage delinquency rates
This is so true. Being uncomfortable give us the drive to do better. Its like a cold shower.
Slavery is self imposed for those who fear the burden of freedom.
Ignorance is strength
Yes, most people are natural followers, only a minority are natural leaders. An even smaller minority are neither.
The flu psyop made this blatantly clear; perfectly normal, stable, nice people became rabid totalitarians overnight because the authorities told them to. That experiment in postmodern fascism would never have gone so far if most people were not sheep.
Since then I've given up on any hope that the masses will wake up. As Seneca said: the majority is always wrong.
All people are sheep. There are a few wise enough to lead towards greener pastures, and even fewer willing to reconsider the โgreenerโ pasture they just led others to because maybe theyโre still not following their true Master well enough.
Having been there recently myself, I donโt think anyone wats slavery but I agree that most people want a comfortable life and if they think that they have one itโs a tough illusion to give up.
Saylor has it right when he says that Bitcoin is for people who need it (I paraphrase).
Nothing is new under the sun. This has been the case forever: peopleโs natural inequality doesnโt encompass only their physical appearance, but their mental and spiritual abilities also. The bell curve works quite well here.
It is sad that the majority of Americans choose the cage. Weak men make hard times... and they are definitely not the kind of people that once braved across the country in a wagon to settle on their own.


Quoting from "The Bed of Procustes":
"They are born, then put in a box; they go home to live in a box; they study by ticking boxes; they go to what is called โworkโ in a box, where they sit in their cubicle box; they drive to the grocery store in a box to buy food in a box; they go to the gym in a box to sit in a box; they talk about thinking โoutside the boxโ; and when they die they are put in a box. All boxes, Euclidian, geometrically smooth boxes."
Ha! Thatโs a great quote. Reminds me of the typical Finance Manager in Big Bank or Big Corp. Inc.
Sheep and Shepherds, that's they system they've set up for us
most people cannot think deeply or clearly enough to even realize they are in this position.
I'm having harder and harder time suffering in the company of fools who don't realize the depth of their delusions. And very few actually want to rethink everything in their life on a regular basis and deprogram themselves from centuries of indoctrination that anything above laws of physics is "just the way things are"
"You have to understand.
Most people are not ready to be unplugged.
And many of them are so inured,
so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it"
Morpheus
Thatโs why Iโm not so sure people will rush en masse to Bitcoin if things go south.
๐ฏ
Responsibility delivers freedom.
Discipline attracts the power to make it so.
The rabble mistake comfort & pleasure for evidence of having both. When in reality they lack them most.
Bitcoin fixes this.
The Exodus illustrates
100!
Be a wolf or a dog. Many choose dog. Free food and all.
This describes the phenomenon of the self acclaimed Libertarian Socialists. They basically redefine the words.
I was also suprised. I remember reading MirBTC's tweets in 2020 and thinking, "That's crazy. I could never imagine lockdowns in the U.S. Freedom is too embedded into our culture.
Two weeks later, I learned an important lesson. I was wrong.
Peaceful parenting fixes this
Saw the same connection this AM with a lady who informed about a bylaw that doesnโt allow shirtless in public spaces which included the park I was at, of course shirtless. She told me all about the work she did with the police and how severe the bylaw violations were. She didnโt answer why the bylaw was needed only she was informing to โsave othersโ from the bylaw. Iโm fairly positive Iโm a strong reason they wanted this shirtless bylaw nonsense.
Dark day for my mitochondria.
You have no idea how right you are. I discovered this a long time ago too. People want someone to control them. They want to follow others. Very few are those who donโt. Thatโs the reason for fashion and everything people do. Most of them canโt and donโt want to take responsibility. Few are those who not only donโt seek convenience but also stand up against the system, risking suffering for it.
nevent1qqs2uene72jklczcpjcfzlw4xyk4lp7gc5cakj6ualprnded33h7xag3yakzv
This is why we are $37 trillion in debt and no one bats an eye while driving around in cars they canโt afford and depreciating in value. People are fat, happy and clueless. Just like the powers that be want them
So true. Probably a symptom of conditioning. We always go back to what we know.
The duality of life is quite ironic amigo.
Unfortunately you are 100% correct
Balls and brains are needed.


I donโt know why things have to be framed in such stark, extreme, judgemental terms. I would put it as, young people seek financial stability, especially if their parents are immigrants (or something like that). So they get the higher education, go to graduate school, and figure out that the jobs that you can get with higher education are not necessarily places of respect.
But rent is a real thing. Itโs like the main financial expense. In the US, a job is connected to health insurance.
Thatโs why I think some sort of passive income from investing should be available to everyone. Especially hourly wage workers, free-lancers, or people trying to do something creative.
Currently, passive income through investing seems only possible for people with interest and knowledge in finance, *and* who also have the extra cash to invest.
this post is another one of those posts where the individual is blamed rather than looking at the macro thingsโฆ like the societal systems.
It also just vaguely describes the problem in a V for Vendetta way.
I donโt get why Lyn Alden reposted this, having written Broken Money.
Most people are still followers, which is actually fine in the context of choice and self responsibility. But in a bad system that creates contradictory incentives, the above reality causes terrible long term consequences.
Itโs basically true in either context, but in one environment, toxic incentives cause enormous suffering, while in another it enables strong standardization without hampering creativity and change.
(I almost didnโt respond because of your โI canโt believe Lyn Alden renoted thisโ remark. If you want to add a thought go ahead. But the moralization of casual social interaction and thinking out loud just comes off as entitled and holier-than-thou. Just a suggestion.)
You posted in the following style -
โฆ cartoonish (like Ren and Stimpy). This kind of post feels designed to provoke a reaction, not invite real dialogue. The replies are just a chorus of โso trueโ from people who already agree, โฆ whatโs the point of having a convo in an echo chamber?
comments section: bobbleheaded agreement bots and recycled slogans.
This writing is โฆ a synchronized yes-machine. Super vague, super polarized, and blaming of the individual with no context. So yeah I am very surprised Lyn reposted it with also no context. Who even knows what โgroupโ of people youโre judging?
Freedom=Responsibility. The government made a business out of putting people who get too carried away with their โfreedomโ in cages.
It is normal and ok to have out of the box ideas, And this could be equated to โfreedomโ, However a better understanding in my experience is Competition vs rule of law. It is a blanket statement to try something unusual, Be condemned, And then say โYou are impinging on my freedom!โ Being the victim. Nobody is coming to save you. The consequences of your โfreedomโ is the responsibility you need to take or the government puts you in their cage. If you really want to do what you want become a politician and start putting your competitors in cages. Then you can have the freedom to do fuck all and enjoy it, Which is what I think most people of as freedom.
My opinion is that freedom is the ability to create the life I want without anyone fucking with me about it, And this requires a constant ability for me to educate myself on what laws are and what I can and cannot do. There is always an asshole out there that wants to fuck your day up just because they donโt like the way you look. And fuck them anyway.
why do young adults get jobs? They donโt want to be a burden to their parents. Also, when their parents get older, they might need help.
Itโs harder for Millenials to purchase a house.
Very few people, percentage-wise, can afford to invest large amounts into Bitcoin. If they can dollar cost average, itโs slow and takes time.
So it sounds like this post is creating some judgy narrative that whoever works at a job is someone who โloves being a slaveโ and is โscared of freedomโ.
I said exactly nothing about jobs or anything you have assumed in your note.
Wait...you mean that you said what you said and not what you didnt say?
yep you wrote your post in a vague judgmental-emotional way.
This post uses dehumanizing language. Reposting something that calls people slaves because they live differently or make different choices is a big red flag. It makes the writer look out of touch, arrogant, and/or dismissive of real systemic issues.
Way to double down. Get over yourself
do you know how to communicate without insulting?
Most bitcoiners donโt. โHave fun staying poorโ their emotional EQ is trash lol itโs why Bitcoin has only evolved to generate more demand for u.s. dollars.
exactly!!!! I keep seeing repetitions of that type of language and itโs just like, what is the point of saying that?!
ok bully!
"when you have nothing to loose you are really free"
I have worked a government job and nearly all my coworkers were like this. They fear freedom and think slavery is freedom. Mind boggling!
A truth I was surprised to discover:
Most people want slavery. They just want to be comfortable. And the moment a little bit of freedom causes discomfort, they rush back to their cage.
Then to delude themselves because they canโt accept that reality, they label all things uncomfortable as โslaveryโ and all things comfortable as โfreedom.โ Convincing themselves that because their cage is โnice and safe,โ this means they are actually free.
View quoted note →
When you say 'most people want slavery' I see a strong ambiguity wherein you may be implying both, but I'd like to touch on it. Do you mean people want to be slaves or they want the institution (albeit invisible) whereby they benefit from outsourced slave labor? Perhaps a mix of both to assist in their own self-delusion that you mentioned?
I think most people want to be directed, not to be slaved. But given the stark reality of the choices available, they take the path of least resistance which is slavery. But to say they want the slavery seems disingenuous; they want the convenience and (often unwittingly) accept the slavery.
I've been thinking about slavery an awful lot... It almost seems like slavery is this unavoidable problem or quality of humanity on some level. If that is true, which is possible it might not be, then we need to be really careful about who or what we are slaves to. I'm being pretty broad, vague and general here on purpose so just keep in mind that I haven't thought too deeply about it. It's just a topic my mind has been returning to frequently. ๐ค
Dostoevsky, he
This is truth and why democracies lead to authoritarianism.
Iโve thought free people must continue to carve new communities to obtain true freedom
From Behold A Pale Horse by Milton William Cooper (1991)The most dangerous place to call home is your own โcomfort zoneโ
Just surviving paycheck to paycheck & using all your free time to watch Netflix should NEVER be the goal!!!
Always push to Learn, Grow, & better yourself inshallah.
#Bitcoin #HosKasi ๐ซต๐พ๐ธ๐ด
nevent1qqsqellr9pyjg5hgrz2rf8hz8axz9qczeyj3u5c2jxk2ap0hp3w22xqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgjz9djw
This sounds like a quote from Loki lol
I happen to agree with this.
Isnโt this basically one of the biggest takeaway lessons from The Big Short?
Free thinkers get laughed at even when theyโre right. Most people do not possess the competence to roll solo so the idea of being ostracized by your โin groupโ triggers life or death fight or flight considerations. People are more worried about fitting in than they are with finding truth.
Solomon Asch figured that out.
Not likely: maybe single digit percent chance, because that would require taking personal responsibility for one's own life.
It's clear worldwide that the Nanny State exists, because majority don't want the above, and prefer to pilfer others through the State. In other words:
A truth I was surprised to discover:
Most people want slavery. They just want to be comfortable. And the moment a little bit of freedom causes discomfort, they rush back to their cage.
Then to delude themselves because they canโt accept that reality, they label all things uncomfortable as โslaveryโ and all things comfortable as โfreedom.โ Convincing themselves that because their cage is โnice and safe,โ this means they are actually free.
View quoted note →
They take the blue pill honey
This is why open systems are so important. Everyone shares the burden and everyone has access to the tools, making reality less scary, even bearable.
Interesting to contemplate.
Is freedom freedom from uncertainty? Then is is never attainable.
Is freedom freedom from the fear of the unknown? Then how does one attain that?
When everything is changing, and rushing ever faster into the unknown, uncertainty and the impossibility of knowing which way to turn is everywhere. If that is the case then where does clarity lie?
If one can have a sense of clarity when the winds of change are blowing, and when change and uncertainty are everywhere, that clarity leads to a fearlessness which is free under all circumstances if it is truly free.
Most people
Not all people
Thank god we still have a few folks out there that truly care about our real freedomโฆ. Regardless of comfort
Thatโs probably most of us on Nostr
The minority?
I think people want symbiosis. They don't want to worry about their food, housing, electricity, basic needs, etc. But they DO want to contribute in a meaningful way. They want to benefit from a system that supports their livelihood, but not at the sacrifice of their freedoms.
Iโd say itโs not that most people actually want slavery, and more that most people are willing to accept slavery because they primarily want to be comfortable.
What do you think about this framing?
I kinda see them as the same thing really. Itโs that valuing comfort above all and desiring to not have responsibility of their own lives, IS a form of seeking slavery. To seek freedom is the explicit decision to take responsibility for your own life.
Most have simply equated freedom, because they see it as a desirable thing, with comfort and *lack* of responsibility, because thatโs what they *really* want. They actually donโt want freedom at all, they are running from it to avoid taking responsibility for their actions and situation.
But arguably, either framing can be considered accurate, imo. Because freedom and responsibility are two sides of the same coin, and most people find comfort in avoiding the weight of responsibility.



