Thread

How can you say that when for for example Putin after the mediation of Merkel stopped the conflict in Ukraine while 30000 ukrainians were surrounded and were about to be eliminated, to sign the first Minsk agreement. Both Merkel and Holland admitted that they used the two Minsk agreements in order to buy time for Ukraine until they build a better army. You have one side, the western-ukrainian side that never honours the agreements and they push war and you have the other side,Putin's side, that always is ready to give peace a chance. And it is Putin that does not invest in peace? What do you expect him to do? To give them again time to rearm? Putin did not wake up one morning and said let's invade Ukraine. It is NATO that is the aggressor here (as always).

Replies (2)

Ok it seems some topics are difficult to discuss. I assume you award the peace price to Putin, when I follow your wording. Words will be just words. People will most of the time tend to elect freedom of speech over authoritarian government when having the option. So who should be in the position to stop Ukraine asking for closer relations with europe? When they want to, I think there can be no legitimate contract that prohibits this.
🛡️
Push war? Which soldier crossed the border? West-ukrainian soldier went to Russia? Or did Russian soldiers cross the border to Ukraine? Does Putin push peace by bombing residential buildings? Peace is quite simple - Putin takes his soldiers back to wherever they came from and poof, magic, there's peace!