You seem to lose yourself in words. Resolving problems with violence is the strongest indicator against peace. Diplomacy is the way of handling problems when one is intrested in peace.
Putin has no crediblility that at any point he was ivtrested in peace, since he entered Ukraine in 2014.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (1)
How can you say that when for for example Putin after the mediation of Merkel stopped the conflict in Ukraine while 30000 ukrainians were surrounded and were about to be eliminated, to sign the first Minsk agreement. Both Merkel and Holland admitted that they used the two Minsk agreements in order to buy time for Ukraine until they build a better army. You have one side, the western-ukrainian side that never honours the agreements and they push war and you have the other side,Putin's side, that always is ready to give peace a chance. And it is Putin that does not invest in peace? What do you expect him to do? To give them again time to rearm? Putin did not wake up one morning and said let's invade Ukraine. It is NATO that is the aggressor here (as always).