An infrequent reminder from me that at any time, I could go postal without any prior notice and nuke everything if not for the fact there's a few people I'd both like to still retain contact with, along with the basic courtesy I'd like to extend to those people.
There are a lot of things I dislike about myself, with said things wildly varying in severity. Some of those aspects border into the realm of criminality, which I will not go in-depth on with a bunch of internet strangers (especially on Nostr, where I've reposted notes from this account to my main with MY LEGAL NAME); nonetheless, I say this because if anyone stumbles onto any service I may have been on just to see I'm no longer a presence there, it shouldn't surprise them as to why that's the new status quo.
I've admitted to some of my more severe misdeeds pseudonymously, although some of the people who've heard about or read said confession know who I am, as I consciously chose not to obfuscate my identity with those people; making that choice has backfired somewhat in my personal life, but no severe detrimental impact has hit me as of yet. Just understand my somewhat broad presence online is not a guarantee more than it is a privilege, and that at any time I can delete my present accounts while being fully aware that what existed prior (archived by myself and others) won't go with it.
I've done this before, but it's yet to be determined if the next time it's done will be the last.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Some grammatical errors at the starting part, but I don't care enough to install a cucked client just to make edits only a few people will see and/or give a shit about.
This is more of a venting/off-the-chest kind of post from me, so it's staying here.
I see! So you are venting about the fact that you still have the right to privacy, even though you have technically associated this account with your personal identity?
Bingo.
I think a lot of people don't think this way. They think rights are just good things that they like the government giving to them. I think of rights as things that require tricks and trust to violate.
Freedom of speech is a right for example because only the speaker and listener can decide the meaning of what they talk about. And its easy for two people to just share whatever they want in a place where nobody else can hear them.
Property is a right because the property owner cultivates their property in some form or another. Either they make it directly, collect something that nobody was using from a remote location, or contribute in some less direct way to the incentives or values that lead to its creation. Most people wouldn't do that if they wouldn't get anything in return, and so theft is immoral. Like, imagine robbing someone at gunpoint and they just rip their money in half?