Thread

If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.

Replies (99)

As of now , most nostr devs here are learning what the Nostr protocol is - the focus is doing quick tutorials to gauge the limits of the protocol .. aka Twitter clone or Insta clones .. I don't think anyone is claiming to replace X or Insta .. I mean ..if they do ..it is kinda pipe dream .. cuz users will always stick to time tested networks ... UNLESS ..they find a new value prop.. That said .. once the protocol becomes a default back end .. when you are NOT building for the protocol , but protocol is a default choice for the application you are focused on .. that is when the true innovation begins ... It is couple years in the future ... But I think we have the proof point for the protocol layer ... Nostr is new layer of internet .. If you are NOT learning /improving this protocol ..you are literally wasting your time ..
You're not wrong — the strongest minds in systems, cryptography, and product aren’t here yet. But maybe that’s exactly the opportunity. Nostr isn’t about status. It’s about freedom. And most of the world’s best minds are still too busy surviving the fiat circus to notice what’s coming.
I'm a Nostr only nobody that digs it here, but this is a bad ass spoonful of "step up yo game" medicine - damn....
User's avatar npub13ndp...0svh
If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.
View quoted note →
lmao.... "bitcoin privilege"... btw "experience, talent, and reputation" mean fuck all when it comes to recognizing the RIGHT thing to do, let alone ACTUALLY DOING IT. most people are one-dimensional trained monkeybots with zero spiritual awareness and certainly no transcendental compass to guide their retarded and scientized intellect anywhere but toward money and quantity. "figure out how to be relevant to other people".... LMAO who the fuck do you think you are you bag of dust?
"Jews own everything" was such an alien word 2 years ago, and ever since that phrase started accumulating popularity a tendency toward low operation cost Apps has skyrocketed because it's the only way to guarantee zero Jewish influence I'm here because of jews and most of new comers If you can't address the reality around us then you can have fun staying politically correct any where other than nostr and get more reach, PUSSY.
User's avatar npub13ndp...0svh
If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.
View quoted note →
🛡️
It's over guys. I'm moving @Zapstore to Pubky, the akshually open protocol that needs an invite code to create an account. After all, it's where the coolest p2p wizards, world-class entrepreneurs and VCs hang out. I'm tired of being a nostr loser working this "freedom tech" nonsense bubble. Now is the time to become a shitcoin expert dev that really does want to fix things. View quoted note →
🛡️
🧂
User's avatar npub13ndp...0svh
If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.
View quoted note →
What a cringe post 😂 the people are temporary, the tech is forever. What a dumb critique. There are many people on nostr I don’t like either, but that doesn’t justify shit. Bitcoin is the money of enemies because its trust-minimized, so shall nostr be for communication.
When I was orange-pilling a friend, she said something like "they should make it easier to buy bitcoin." With Nostr as with Bitcoin there is no they; there's only us. If you think Nostr has potential, YOU figure out how to make it relevant to other people. In the meantime, we're all doing that in our own way here.
Projection? Maybe you're the ego-cult? How many of us shitty devs have you tried to recruit into your invite only Rube Goldberg machine building ... "enterprise" without delivering a thing you dare to show publicly? You've been recruiting since at least two years. I take this message of you as your farewell. Come back when you can show something.
🛡️
❤️‍🔥
User's avatar npub13ndp...0svh
If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.
View quoted note →
🛡️
I've been following this on & off all day and I still fail to see what this guy is trying to accomplish here besides possibly poaching some developers or users? It comes across as very unprofessional. All the points he's brought up have been discussed openly, with multiple ideas and proposals floated in a constructive, maybe sometimes contentious, fashion in the past. I have seen no reason to doubt the integrity of anyone who has chosen to take on the difficult tasks.
"Ask yourself who the buikders are that aren't choosing nostr and why" Immediately went to your pubky site and there is no link to your github (or even download via fdroid) so I could even possibly assess what are the benefits of the development you're doing without having google involved, so that is a red flag. Uses aurora store, to download and immediately doesn't work without an invite code, red flag. So what actually am I supposed to compare nostr to? Don't say centralized services either because sure having builders is cool, but most of those folks will admit to you that they are sacrificing some of their own principles because the pay is good. Like I guarantee you if you go ask engineers on Facebook about the fact that it's fucked up that no one outside fb can use the data they will agree.
🛡️
↩ replying to npub1wsv8...2kt8
I tried it too. I was not interested in accepting the pubky terms, did anyway, then the app could not connect to any servers and I closed it as useless Compared to almost any actually permissionless Nostr app, this is … not working BUT PEOPLE LIKE HIM WOULD BUILD ON NOSTR IF NOSTR WORKED, you know, if only we could all communicate easily via this protocol John sounds like a shitcoiner trying to convince people to join his DAO
1. Nostr doesn't need people like you. Ego is not a skill set that pervades Nostr. This is not Twitter. 2. First impressions from your statement- predatory, monetizing and attempts to undermine the vibrant culture growing from the roots up. Not from the tree tops down. 3. Take the time to check out Jack Dorsey, Jeff Booth, Lyn Alden - all of them and many others like them are here educating dumb asses like me, and I'm grateful. 4. So get down from that tree top and stop Godomizing yourself .
🛡️
Bitcoin is succeeding because centralized FIAT failed. Nostr will succeed when centralized social medias fail. It just needs to be ready when the time comes. To answer your question. You have a very centralized way to think. I don't believe that a good idea is automatically adopted by everyone.
The reason @npub13ndp...0svh hates Nostr is because he's being paid by Tether to develop a competing project. Simple as that. The same goes for the rest of the Twitter influencers, the reason they all hate Nostr is because they're being paid by Elon.
User's avatar npub13ndp...0svh
If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.
View quoted note →
😄 Terms of Service 😂 Privacy Policy 🤣 Age Verification image
User's avatar npub13ndp...0svh
If nostr were the answer, people like me would be building on it. Ask yourselves who the builders are that aren't choosing nostr, and why. Then ask yourselves what all the people building here have in common. Then compare these groups earnestly. I dont just mean Bitcoiners vs Bluehairsky. I mean their experience, talent, and reputation. I mean the most talented and resourceful people; people that innovate, and have deep expertise. Why aren't they leaving where they are to build here? Examples: Bitcoin Core devs, shitcoin expert devs that really do want to fix things, talented cryptographers, deeply experienced systems/p2p people, experienced entrepreneurs, reputable VCs and funders. The closest I see here are people that got Bitcoin-rich and are now learning how to be angels by naively funding their friends and dead-end startup projects that arent much better than weekend hackathon submissions. A sandbox for playing. Everything worth anything here is a subdivision of Bitcoin culture itself and Bitcoin privilege. Bitcoin is the only provider of talent and resources to Nostr. That worked great to bootstrap from nothing, but now what? Deal with this, and figure out how to be relevant to other people, or Nostr will continue to be nothing more than a perpetual hackathon sandbox subsidized by a Bitcoiner ego-cult.
View quoted note →
People look to justify their own actions all the time “People like me” says it all You’re free to build wherever you want John, that’s absolutely true Go for it I hope you’re not missing ways to potentially incorporate Nostr into your products as they are As for the potential of Nostr, let’s see with time what’s true I for one embrace the idea that a new generation of capital allocators are entering the fray, backing ideas they see as valuable, in a manner that makes sense to them If wrong. The time and moneys gone. If right. Well you’re point is totally disproven