Thread

🛡️
The Bitcoin Core vs Knots debate is framed as “pro-spam” vs “anti-spam.” This is obviously a false dichotomy. Core isn’t “pro-spam” and running Bitcoin Core on your node does not make YOU “pro-spam.” Anyone who frames it as such is either purposefully gaslighting or retarded.

Replies (8)

The debate centers on whether Bitcoin is primarily a monetary network and if it should also serve as an unmoderated data transfer network. If you consider Bitcoin to be a monetary network, then non-monetary data on it can be regarded as spam.
Core v 30 enables more spam, meaning it is pro-spam. Based on your propaganda you are either gaslightnig or retarded. But the truth may be that your close friends like Lopp are spammers and shitcoiners.
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
This is the disgusting shitcoin spammers business model. Now they sell message storage on Bitcoin but you can see its capped to 80 Bytes (on OP_RETURN). Do you wonder why? Becuase filters work. Next they want it to 100 KB and start selling distributed storage for CSAM. Its fucking disgusting. image https://poststr.com/
View quoted note →
Have you ever told the root cause of this "debate"? Something about Citrea starting it? Do you remember how Core CENSORED contributors, devs and other peoples opinion for just mentioning Citrea? Do you remember Core supporters attacking Bitcoin Knots? Your and Core gaslighting is not the worst things. We already saw worse things. But the truth is out ther, for example in this video ...
Matthew Kratter's avatar Matthew Kratter
Bitcoin Core Hitting New Lows
View quoted note →