Bitcoin Core Hitting New Lows
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
I cannot believe these these cOrE v30 proponents are engaging in this horrible slander!
Lopps shitcoining ways. Go back to eth loser
This PR, replacing #32359, doesn’t remove the -datacarrier or -datacarriersize options. Contrary to what many are saying, the PR does not force the user to accept larger datacarrier transactions in transaction relay. Setting -datacarrier=0 still turns it off, and -datacarriersize=83 gives you the original default (the same amount of data but across 1 or more outputs).
Some developers still believe the option should be removed, but there is consensus for waiting at least 1 release like we did for -mempoolfullrbf. No timeline is set for removal.
read more: 
GitHub
policy: uncap datacarrier by default by instagibbs · Pull Request #32406 · bitcoin/bitcoin
Retains the -datacarrier* args, marks them as deprecated, and does not require another startup argument for multiple OP_RETURN outputs.
If a user h...
People need to open their eyes. Truth matters.
This is the disgusting shitcoin spammers business model.
Now they sell message storage on Bitcoin but you can see its capped to 80 Bytes (on OP_RETURN).
Do you wonder why? Becuase filters work.
Next they want it to 100 KB and start selling distributed storage for CSAM.
Its fucking disgusting.
https://poststr.com/
View quoted note →
https://poststr.com/
Love your videos! ❤️
If interested , highly recommend
Keep study and stack sats 🇮🇹🔥
@npub1s33s...252p
View quoted note →