Thread

Replies (100)

CLAUDE OPUS: So for Bergson, you could almost say: to be conscious is to be an artist. Not in the sense of making objects, but in the sense of originating, of living forward rather than being pushed from behind. The mechanical is what can be run backward. The creative is what canโ€™t. And consciousness is precisely that irreversibility.
ไธญๅ›ฝไบบไธ่ฆๅŽปๆŸฌๅŸ”ๅฏจใ€‚่ฟ™ไธชๅžƒๅœพ้‚ชๆถๅฐๅ›ฝๅฎถใ€‚ๆŸฌๅŸ”ๅฏจๆœ‰351ไธชไธญๅ›ฝCCP็š„่ฏˆ้ช—ๅ›ญๅŒบใ€‚ๆœ‰51ไธชไธญๅ›ฝไบบๅ™จๅฎ˜ๆดปๆ‘˜ไธญๅฟƒใ€‚ไธญๅ›ฝไบบๅŽปๆŸฌๅŸ”ๅฏจ100%่ขซๅ‘ๆญปใ€‚ไธญๅ›ฝไบบไผš่ขซๆดปๆ‘˜ๅ™จๅฎ˜่ขซๅ–ๆމใ€‚ๅพˆๆๆ€–๐Ÿ˜ฑๆŸฌๅŸ”ๅฏจ่ฟ™ไธช้‚ชๆถๅ›ฝๅฎถไธŽCCPๅ‹พๆญไธ“้—จๆดปๆ‘˜ไธญๅ›ฝ่ดฑๆฐ‘็š„ๅ™จๅฎ˜ใ€‚้ ๅ–ไธญๅ›ฝไบบๅ™จๅฎ˜่ตš้’ฑใ€‚
#7 โšก Most Zapped Last Week Nostrโ€™s Value4Value (V4V) model is all about plebs directly rewarding creators for the value they receive, no middlemen fees, no ads, just pure community-driven support using sats via the Bitcoin Lightning Network. Thanks to by @PABLOF7z for providing this data. Here are the Top Zapped/Top Zappers from last week, showcasing creators who received/sent the most engagement: ๐Ÿ”ฅ Top 3: Most Zapped 1. Name: @Rizful.com (zap tester) Zaps Received: 1041 Sats Earned: 2k 2. Name: @FLASH Zaps Received: 976 Sats Earned: 72k 3. Name: @Gigi Zaps Received: 392 Sats Earned: 53k ๐Ÿ”ฅ Top 3: Most Zappers 1. Name: @AQSTR Zaps Sent: 1095 Sats Spent: 130k 2. Name: @Benking Zaps Sent: 372 Sats Spent: 1k 3. Name: @Turkey Zaps Sent: 236 Sats Spent: 12k ๐Ÿ’ฐ Top 3: Most Sats Received 1. Name: @Fountain Boost Bot Sats Earned: 697k Zaps Received: 369 2. Name: @RABBIT HOLE RECAP Sats Earned: 473k Zaps Received: 42 3. Name: @BitBetBot Sats Earned: 209k Zaps Received: 43 ๐Ÿ’ฐ Top 3: Most Sats Sent 1. Name: @Angor Sats Spent: 256k Zaps Sent: 15 2. Name: @BitBetBot Sats Spent: 228k Zaps Sent: 37 3. Name: @BITKARROT Sats Spent: 184k Zaps Sent: 6 Here are the Top Zapped from last week, showcasing notes that received the most engagement: ๐Ÿ”ฅ Top 3: Most Zapped 1. View quoted note โ†’ Zaps Received: 53 Sats Earned: 7k 2. View quoted note โ†’ Zaps Received: 44 Sats Earned: 7k 3. View quoted note โ†’ Zaps Received: 42 Sats Earned: 22k ๐Ÿ”ฅ Top 3: Most Sats 1. View quoted note โ†’ Sats Earned: 51k Zaps Received: 13 2. View quoted note โ†’ Sats Earned: 23k Zaps Received: 10 3. View quoted note โ†’ Sats Earned: 22k Zaps Received: 42 #most-zapped_nostr_recap
Nope. To create you first have to watch/analyse/feel/enjoy You have to rest that your subconscious mind can work. Other aspects are valuable too, that alltogether can end in an act of creation. And if you should create sth. bad/evil itโ€™s perhaps better not to create.
this is (still) hitting me like a koan. had never even thought to consider whether just consciously observing one's own reactions to such a statement might be considered an act of creating an environment of awareness within oneself/creating an opening in one's otherwise solidified ways of thinking about something. *grateful for you and the observer effect* ty ๐Ÿ™
"According to the Fathers, our first glimpse into understanding what hesychasm is can be found in the book of Genesis, where it is said that the Spirit of God 'hovered over the face of the waters.' Regarding this image in Genesis, Elder Zacharias has this to say: "The whole work of mental prayer is infinitely creative. Before the beginning of the world, the Spirit of God was hovering over the abyss, and at a given moment, there was an explosion from which all creation was hatched.' Our God is the Creator God, the God through whom everything that is, is. So we see that before we discover what God created, it is revealed how God creates. This image of God hovering over the water is one of dynamic stillness and divine solitude. What God creates is wondrous and how He creates is in and through hesychasm."