Just received a call from Apple, I have to remove zaps from posts in the next version
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (71)
Did you send them a link to ZapplePay?
@npub1plst...kx8j next?
果然是還ä¸å¤ 肥🙊
早期比特å¸é’±åŒ…上架常碰到类似问题,å†å‘展大些就好了。
Bitcoin is inevitable, so is Nostr.

"在ç§åä¸ï¼Œæœªæ¥çš„æ£®æž—å·²ç»å˜åœ¨ã€‚"
感觉我也快了 😅
类似的事情微信闹过一éï¼ŒåŽæ¥äº’相妥å了,nostrå¯ä»¥å‚考。


微信é‡å¼€å…¬ä¼—å·æ‰“èµï¼Œå’Œè‹¹æžœæ‰¯çš®ä¸€å¹´å¤šç»ˆäºŽæœ‰ç»“果了
å›¾ç‰‡æ¥æºï¼šè§†è§‰ä¸å›½6月6日,微信官方公众å·å‘æ–‡å®£å¸ƒï¼Œé‡æ–°å¼€æ”¾å…¬ä¼—å·æ‰“èµåŠŸèƒ½ï¼Œè€ŒåŠŸèƒ½çš„åå—ä¹Ÿå˜æˆäº†â€œå–œæ...
“2017å¹´9月,苹果更新了App Storeæ¡ä¾‹ä¸çš„3.2.1第七æ¡ï¼Œå³å…³äºŽåº”用内用户相互打èµçš„内容,更新åŽçš„æ¡ä¾‹æ˜¾ç¤ºï¼Œä¸ªäººç”¨æˆ·å¯ä»¥åœ¨ä¸é€šè¿‡åº”用内è´ä¹°çš„形弿¥å‘å…¶ä»–ç”¨æˆ·èµ äºˆç¤¼ç‰©ï¼Œä½†åº”ç”¨å¼€å‘者ä¸èƒ½ä»Žä¸æŠ½æˆã€‚â€
微信是什么体é‡ï¼Œè¯ºæ–¯ç‰¹æ˜¯ä»€ä¹ˆä½“é‡ï¼Œä¸å¯åŒæ—¥è€Œè¯ã€‚而且诺斯特和微信还有个最大的ä¸åŒï¼Œè¯ºæ–¯ç‰¹æ˜¯å议,是网络,在 web2 世界里并ä¸å˜åœ¨å®žé™…主体,如腾讯公å¸
苹果公å¸å¦‚果自己当真也éµå®ˆè¿™æ¡è§„则,就ä¸å¯èƒ½æœ‰çŽ°åœ¨è¿™ä¸€å‡ºå‡ºçš„å¨èƒä¸‹æž¶æˆç
适用这æ¡çš„争议应该在于nostr行为是per keyè€Œä¸æ˜¯per user,pubkey和个人ä¸ç‰åŒï¼Œè¿™æœ¬æ˜¯nostr特殊的地方,其他应用用户å¯ä»¥ç‰ä»·åˆ°ä¸ªäººã€‚
nostr fundå¯ä»¥é›‡ä½£ä¸“业的商务谈判去处ç†è¿™ä»¶äº‹æƒ…。
zapç»å¯¹ç¬¦åˆï¼š
3.2.1 Acceptable
(vii) Apps may enable individual users to give a monetary gift to another individual without using in-app purchase, provided that (a) the gift is a completely optional choice by the giver, and (b) 100% of the funds go to the receiver of the gift. However, a gift that is connected to or associated at any point in time with receiving digital content or services must use in-app purchase.
It was anticipated that it would happen, but the feeling is still very disheartening.
#fuckapple
The gatekeeping legacy systems...
View quoted note →
hey, congrats on this, seriously
Tell them it’s fine, we’ve got ZapplePay
ecash实现zapçš„è¯åŸºæœ¬æ˜¯ç¤¼å“å¡å…‘æ¢çš„原ç†ï¼Œè€Œä¸æ˜¯å¼•入支付系统,å¯èƒ½é€šè¿‡Appleå®¡æ ¸ä¼šå®¹æ˜“äº›ã€‚
View quoted note →
Don’t care. Still zapping.
The gaze of Sauron is upon you.
All good as long as custom emoji reactions work.
Dump Apple Pay and use ZapplePay
View quoted note →
Sorry man. Apple does whatever they want… like a damn honey badger
Slowly moving away from Apple.
View quoted note →
One day yall will stop wasting ya time on apple bullshit...
Let Apple control idiots money.
Not yours....
🙄
View quoted note →
Bummer, but it was inevitable.
I’m not a lawyer. I wonder if Apple considering these Zaps as payments (money) is in conflict with the fact that the US does not recognize Bitcoin as money.
🤨
Fair point. (Not a lawyer either)
Does not surprise me 🫤
Is there not a way to make zap workflows outside of the apps as a user-defined workflow? Just like nsecBunker is an inbound workflow for a client, we could have outbound workflows. It could be called anything. A user could kick a workflow, outside of the app, by clicking a button on a note, if he wants that workflow to zap the author then fine, but it could be something else such as tag it in a community (nostr.kiwi). After all, nostr’s strength is interoperability ☺ï¸. No?
Kinda like this zapplepay.com ?
Exactly
Stop making shit for Apple
They got good hardware and really missing their user base would hurt nostr adoption no?
Did they provide an explanation for the reason? Is it because they can’t tax it or due to other concerns?
Throwing out apple products like


I just zapped you from my Iris.to web client on my Safari browser and there’s nothing Apple can do about it.
🤣 🤣 🤣 Fuck Apple.
At least you iOS folks now have Zapple Pay as a workaround.
View quoted note →
I’m zapping you from iOS now ;)
Oy vey I could feel Tom Apple seethe while I did it.
😂
Hope that Google is not looking 😅
View quoted note →
They'll change their mind within a year.
Otherwise, forgoing Bitcoin adoption and choosing to rely on legacy system monies will be their undoing.
Adopt or die scenario.
Add Zapplepay.
Fuck ‘em!
Jerks. Was only a matter of time based on the past few weeks unfortunately.
But Why? 😡
Apple insists on getting a cut (usually 30%) of all payments that use its platform
Lightning isn't Apple's platform.
Yeah, I'm certainly not defending them. They are exploiting their monopolist chokepoint to exclude any payment platform other than the one they can control and take 30%
I was hoping the new DMA law in Europe would force them to allow alternate in-app payment, but it seems they still might insist on getting a cut, and probably wanting it in standard currencies, not in any blockchain currency


Mobile Dev Memo by Eric Seufert
The DMA and alternative in-app payments: too early to celebrate | Mobile Dev Memo by Eric Seufert
The DMA and alternative in-app payments: too early to celebrate. Mobile marketing and advertising, freemium monetization strategy, and marketing sc...
Next phone won’t be Apple I’ll tell you that much
stop using apple products. they have nothing but contempt for their own customers.
How about...
Don't make an update.
🤣
View quoted note →
For which product?
bruh
Sadly, it's the danger of building a business on top of the business of someone else... they own you. Still, I hope Apple will finish to understand the potential of Bitcoin for them too.
Then you don't update. xD
I guess it was a matter of time.
This is an achievement actually.
Congrats king 👑
Bummer. I suppose that's eventually coming for all the zap-enabled apps. Still, frustrating.
So are bitcoiners gonna ditch apple yet or keep using permissioned services?
Fuc# em!
Is that because apple doesn't have a wallet to take their 30%? 🤔ðŸ˜
