₿itcoin ₿ombadil

Many people telling you to “just outbid the Spammers” … are also telling you to “just spend your Bitcoin and trigger a cap gains, income tax, and sales tax” …and we also need CTV, Covenants, and more functionality And also telling you filters are bad for Bitcoin. 🤡🌎

Block Template Centralization is the obvious threat to Bitcoin’s censorship resistance, but overt censorship like OFAC compliance is too obvious. We would route around that. So attackers ran a covert attack using spamouflage & spambiguity to censor Bitcoin with bullshit data.

Covid was gain of function. Quantum is gain of function. Non-monetary data on Bitcoin is gain of function. Electronic Peer to Peer Cash is gain of gumption. Study Bitcoin.

Definition of GUMPTION

enterprise, initiative; common sense, horse sense… See the full definition

Trespass: a violation of moral or social ethics; an unwarranted infringement -Webster’s Dictionary Spam is Trespass. Bitcoin is Money. Spam is Trespass on Bitcoin.

Definition of TRESPASS

to commit a trespass; especially : to enter unlawfully upon the land of another; err, sin; to make an unwarranted or uninvited incursion… See the...

Would you buy an insurance policy from a company that turns a blind eye to moral hazard and reckless behavior by its other policy holders? Or would you prefer if the insurance company tried to mitigate moral hazard and reckless behavior? Now apply these questions to Bitcoin.

The block size limit in 2010 was for spam prevention and it was definitely not suicidal or delusional… similar preventative thinking and strategy is required today… we need to stop being so passive… good Byzantine Generals are vigilant Spam is slow poison that poses gradually than suddenly risks to Bitcoin. Now is the time to Act and cut this cancer out of our culture.

Why can't anyone on the Anti-Filter side make a persuasive argument that defends Core v.30 normalizing 100kb Op_Returns + neglecting obvious Spam vulnerabilities for almost 3 years now. Bitcoin Maintainers are supposed to maintain Bitcoin. Instead, they neglect basic maintenance.

The 83 byte Op_Return policy limit that stood in Bitcoin for 10 years was effectively a Gentlemen’s Agreement. Core broke this Gentlemen’s Agreement in 2025 in a most disgraceful manner. This is knot gentlemen. If you know, you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡

Core is forcing a change in consensus rules because they decided to make a mockery of Bitcoin’s policy standards that had been in place for many years. The Core Maintainers are bad faith actors, wittingly or unwittingly. Time for them to resign.

The road back to Fiat Clown World is paved with the convenient centralization of the Bitcoin Block Template Cartel. In order to maximize the resilience and redundancy of Bitcoin we should encourage Hash to pivot back to building their own blocks like Satoshi did. 🇺🇸🦅🫡