₿itcoin ₿ombadil

Many people telling you to “just outbid the Spammers” … are also telling you to “just spend your Bitcoin and trigger a cap gains, income tax, and sales tax” …and we also need CTV, Covenants, and more functionality And also telling you filters are bad for Bitcoin. 🤡🌎

Block Template Centralization is the obvious threat to Bitcoin’s censorship resistance, but overt censorship like OFAC compliance is too obvious. We would route around that. So attackers ran a covert attack using spamouflage & spambiguity to censor Bitcoin with bullshit data.

Covid was gain of function. Quantum is gain of function. Non-monetary data on Bitcoin is gain of function. Electronic Peer to Peer Cash is gain of gumption. Study Bitcoin.

Definition of GUMPTION

enterprise, initiative; common sense, horse sense… See the full definition

Trespass: a violation of moral or social ethics; an unwarranted infringement -Webster’s Dictionary Spam is Trespass. Bitcoin is Money. Spam is Trespass on Bitcoin.

Definition of TRESPASS

to commit a trespass; especially : to enter unlawfully upon the land of another; err, sin; to make an unwarranted or uninvited incursion… See the...

The 83 byte Op_Return policy limit that stood in Bitcoin for 10 years was effectively a Gentlemen’s Agreement. Core broke this Gentlemen’s Agreement in 2025 in a most disgraceful manner. This is knot gentlemen. If you know, you Knots. Filters up.✊🏼🫡

Core is forcing a change in consensus rules because they decided to make a mockery of Bitcoin’s policy standards that had been in place for many years. The Core Maintainers are bad faith actors, wittingly or unwittingly. Time for them to resign.