Thread

Core devs, including her, has deliberately allowed inscriptions spam. They are now using that as excuse that "spam can't be reduced" or that "spam already exists on Bitcoin because of inscription spam". That is dishonest and an internal attack on Bitcoin. Core devs deliberately allow spam and then defend it like shitcoiners. Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
GitHub
datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying by luke-jr · Pull Request #28408 · bitcoin/bitcoin
Updates -datacarriersize to be effective with newer datacarrying styles.
GitHub
Witness scripts being abused to bypass datacarriersize limit (CVE-2023-50428) · Issue #29187 · bitcoin/bitcoin
The datacarriersize policy option is meant to limit the size of extra data allowed in transactions for relaying and mining. Since the end of 2022, ...

Replies (1)

Shouldn't you be blaming the miners for including the txns you don't like? Or, shouldn't you be providing an actual solution that prevents txns you don't like from being possible inside of bitcoin blocks? Arguing policy is pointless, just make the config you like and convince miners to run it.