She didn't say anything bad. The idea is that ALL transactions can be subjectively judged, and there will always be txns people don't like. We have NO WAY to know how people are using txns, or even how they value those txns. All txns are "NFTs" and none are explicitly more "money" than the others.
This orients the conversation correctly, away from policy discussion, toward protocol discussion, forcing opponents to properly propose REAL solutions for data on Bitcoin, instead of handwaving policy drama that fixes nothing.
Currently, this is mostly a culture war over default settings in an app.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Core devs, including her, has deliberately allowed inscriptions spam.
They are now using that as excuse that "spam can't be reduced" or that "spam already exists on Bitcoin because of inscription spam".
That is dishonest and an internal attack on Bitcoin. Core devs deliberately allow spam and then defend it like shitcoiners.
Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.

GitHub
datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying by luke-jr · Pull Request #28408 · bitcoin/bitcoin
Updates -datacarriersize to be effective with newer datacarrying styles.
GitHub
Witness scripts being abused to bypass datacarriersize limit (CVE-2023-50428) · Issue #29187 · bitcoin/bitcoin
The datacarriersize policy option is meant to limit the size of extra data allowed in transactions for relaying and mining. Since the end of 2022, ...
A default setting was the entire business model of Mozilla Firefox.
Default settings matter, and this is the most important open source app in the world.
this reply is straight up core's lying propaganda copy paste.