Thread

It's the second one ...

So I've been silently observing, but I don't think I've seen any evidence towards: > and given enough incentives to bypass it (as we've seen exist) The constantly unwritten thing here is this desire to enable these services like citrea. Giving core the benefit of the doubt, the only "bypass" we have observed (AFAIK) is their willingness to use junk utxos. Just as jpegs in the witness can be called out as temporary, so too can citrea's attack if we don't facilitate their desires. Both cause irreversible damage btw, increasing the cost to run a node. Maybe the utxo bloat is objectively worse? Would be good to learn. What is your thoughts on that.

What personal attacks? Do you think cashu is bitcoin? Since when is stating an opinion is not an “attack”. What you can’t seem to get through your head is that trust in core developers is broken. They can walk it back all they want but they have shown their true colors. They made a controversial decision without taking node runners’ input into consideration. Instead of having an open conversation they locked down their repo and attacked people with opposing views. Knots software lets me configure my node however I’d like. I can configure it to be like core if I want. Core is catering to shitcoiners and I don’t want nothing to do with that.

"core didn't remove the option" is disingenuous. Core made the default value 100k bytes and deprecated the option. That's what people are opposed to.