Thread

lol The fact is core is on a power trip making changes that users (node runners) disagree with. You can use all the big brain logic you want but the simple truth is core isn’t in charge. Nor are the miners. The node runners will forever be in control. image

Replies (5)

🛡️
core didn’t even remove the option and there is well reasoned justification for the change. what is your response to cores most comprehensive answer to this debate? Or are you now stuck with personal attacks now that your narrative has been completely unravelled.
Bitcoin Stack Exchange
Implications of OP_RETURN changes in upcoming Bitcoin Core version 30.0
As you may know, there has been a debate around the upcoming release of Bitcoin Core. I hear the arguments against it and I agree that Bitcoin is m...
↩ replying to jb55
So I've been silently observing, but I don't think I've seen any evidence towards: > and given enough incentives to bypass it (as we've seen exist) The constantly unwritten thing here is this desire to enable these services like citrea. Giving core the benefit of the doubt, the only "bypass" we have observed (AFAIK) is their willingness to use junk utxos. Just as jpegs in the witness can be called out as temporary, so too can citrea's attack if we don't facilitate their desires. Both cause irreversible damage btw, increasing the cost to run a node. Maybe the utxo bloat is objectively worse? Would be good to learn. What is your thoughts on that.