Telegram quietly updates FAQ, removing:
"All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
What if the whole βintentβ behind this whole thing is to drive people away from using telegram, and trusting it as a platform?
Undermine public trustβ¦
What if they canβt read messages on there.
So they undermine people trust in it, driving them towards platforms they can monitorβ¦
Thatβs just a conspiracy theory thoβ¦ however if you think about it, doesnβt it make sense?
I have a growing list of concerns with Telegram, but let's strive to be fair & balanced in our reporting. In the main, this change looks to be part of a broader reorganization of the FAQ to incorporate more EU-specific citations. As others have pointed out, the phrase in question is still present; it's just been moved to a different heading.
Got to love companies that create a monopoly for their service and then update their terms of service that would keep most of their users away from their product. How is this legal or moral?
For the FBI/MI5/CIA agents monitoring this telegram channel, i declare that i have no idea how i got here. Probably through forced invite. I do not condone with or encourage of any illegal activities carried out within this channel. Illegal activities are frowned upon and are not endorsed by anyone in this channel.
Acredito que o Telegram esteja com os dias contados para os brasileiros que buscam privacidade.
A gente estΓ‘ assistindo a ofensiva dos estados contra a privacidade dos seus respectivos cidadΓ£os. Brasil nΓ£o vai ser uma exceΓ§Γ£o.
View quoted note β