Thread
Login to reply
Replies (54)
You are one of my favorite writers npub1dergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsh9xzpc , can't wait to go deep down on this.
It's very short, so you'll be at the deep and in 2 minutes.
*deep end
(and thank you for the kind words)
LET'S FUCKING GO
"You have to decide how to move forward. You have to decide what game you want to play; how much responsibility you are willing to shoulder. Do you want to stay stuck in the machine? A machine that uses and abuses you? A machine that feeds itself by extracting and devouring your time, attention, and value? Or do you have the courage to take control of your wealth, health, thoughts, and speech?
Nobody can make this decision for you. It starts and ends with you."
I love reading Gigi's thoughts
"Nobody can make this decision for you."
This makes me curious to learn what others top decisions are for their own health. What is the protocol for sound health?
Thanks for sharing.
Youβre a good man, Gigi! π§‘π«‘
unoreversecard.jpg
I should start paying more attention to what iβm paying attention to. Thanks for reminding me.
Presence is of the essence. 

Awesome!
Thank you for reading ππ§‘
π«‘
Gigi, you always write such thought probing words. Thanks π again.
The footnote of: βNo information can travel faster than the speed of light.β is crushing my intuitive beliefs. Which is good. π ππ
Iβll contemplate this more & seek to understand better. Appreciation.
wiki β¦
The speed of light is the upper limit for the speeds of objects with positive rest mass, and individual photons cannot travel faster than the speed of light. This is experimentally established in many tests of relativistic energy and momentum. More generally, it is impossible for signals or energy to travel faster than c.
I have been thinking about what information in the intent age will look like when there is no meaningful amount of censorship (perhaps a future Internet built on nostr or something like it).
I think we will reenter a period where it will be critical to think critically about what information you decide to ingest. Parents are going to have to get a lot better at teaching their kids to think and communicate with people wiser than they are.
Excellent piece @Gigi π
Web of trust will be of increasing importance. I hope to write and/or speak about it soon.
Also: A lot of the #SovEng people are working on #WoT stuff.
"Do you have the courage to take control of your wealth, health, thoughts, and speech?"
The challenge is clear and so is the objective. Every time you speak on a centralized platform, free speech takes a step back.
View quoted note β
Humans are so smart, yet so stupid.
If code is speechβ and code is speech. What is our responsibility in this affair?
So much respect to the protocol builders!
βWe are at a pivotal time in history. Never before was our civilization this connected, this global, and this unaware of its limitations and ignorance.β
The last big platform other than fiat I am very aware of participating/allowing to be taken advantage ofβ is LinkedIn. I really want to self de-platform but the notional Rolodex hook has me still hanging on. For now I remain part of the problem.
Gigiβs prose is next level. Easy reading font to boot. π
Thank you for the kind words π
Good luck with the next cohort. βοΈ
PROTOCOLS > PLATFORMS
"WHEN USING A PROTOCOL, YOUβRE NOT A USER IN THE TRADITIONAL SENSE. YOU ARE A SPEAKER. YOU SPEAK THE SAME LANGUAGE AS OTHER PEOPLE, AND IF SOMEONE ELSE CAN HEAR AND UNDERSTAND YOU, THERE IS A CONNECTION. THERE IS NO FACILITATOR IN BETWEEN. THE LANGUAGE ITSELF IS THE FACILITATOR. LANGUAGES ARE PROTOCOLS AND PROTOCOLS ARE LANGUAGES. THEY DONβT HAVE USERS; THEY HAVE SPEAKERS." @Gigi
FREEDOM TECH WINS π§‘ β‘οΈ π = βοΈ
View quoted note β
View quoted note βTremendous.
Make it an article post on nostr!
I will.
As an interpreter, other people's words and ideas have passed through my hands for the Deaf, and past by my lips for the Hearing.
Through me, others lie, manipulate, mourn, joke, laugh, flirt, and fight.
I've done this as a neutral actor - my own emotions & thoughts are sublimated so that others' thoughts/ideas are seen, are heard - they enter the realm of the Real; giving people agency.
Censorship is anethma to free people.
To censor language is to censor the mind.
To censor math is to censor a priori knowledge.
And so,
We're not asking permission.
We're taking our place.
"Thatβs why Free Speech platforms cannot exist. Only Free Speech protocols can exist." To the Point.
Language is one of our base layers.
Onward and Upward. Beauty go up tech
βThere is no proper thinking without proper speaking just like there is no proper speaking without proper thinking. β π―π§‘
Mine Bitcoin from your phone π±


Beautifully and simply correct π€π§‘
a wonderfully written piece π
Thank you ππ§‘
Gigi doesn't say "Nostr" once in this piece, and yet almost every word has a purple halo. Excellent read. π

Because we think about the Greek ancients every day. π«
GM speakers π€
I don't use English; I speak English.
I don't use Bitcoin; I speak Bitcoin.
I don't use Nostr; I speak Nostr.
Respect βπΌ
Good work bro
platform vs public space
For my own understanding, I put this in a physical realm thought experiment:
A public space is a square or agora, if u will.
A platform, letβs call it a stage, is build on such a public space.
People can speak or perform on the square or on the stage. One is permissionless the other is not. It doesnβt tell you anything about the quality of the speaker or performer, if they are on that stage, but it sure directs the attention.
Public spaces give anyone the option to speak or perform. That does not exempt them from consequences of that action of course.
The best part is: I decide to stay and listen or go somewhere else.
All can be said, that doesnβt mean you have to listen. Kind of like #nostr
View quoted note β
Good post. I did not fall asleep while reading
Was it because you were asleep already?
That's when I do most of my reading
amazing article. thank you for sharing
π§‘
love this - thanks mate
The great Bitcoin and nostr synergy; Protocols, not platforms. A protocol is just a language, no need for a middlemen. A platform facilitates the communication, thus they can censor and corrupt as they please.
It's time we learn how to talk again. Talk the language of remote communciation and the language of value transfer. The middleman that current assist us "talking" have failed us, and will continue to do so.
View quoted note β
Just read. Very interesting thoughts.
Wonderful insights as usual sir π«‘
Well said. Thank you.
