Thread

Replies (56)

"Ownership" just means a government grants you temporary exclusive access and they will back that privilege with law and violence, in exchange for money. It's a mafia racket outsourcing violence. It's also ironic because native peoples typically didn't "own" land anyway. I don't know about this particular group, but most native peoples in the Americas didn't have plots that they bought and sold. So now it's only through the introduction of Western property rights that they are even able to make a "legal" claim. Of course there is no "right" answer here, but typically throughout history when empires conquer by force, they don't later relinquish their plunder out of good will. Gives a new meaning to "Indian giving"?
All lands are conquered lands and you only have β€œtitle” to such lands as you can defend it. We now watch to see if Canadian citizens with existing land titles ( because they were part of the previous conquering system) allow themselves to become newly conquered through administrative processes.
Crazy how fast things are shifting. While real estate is starting to show cracks, look at what’s happening on the crypto side… XRP ETFs crossing $1B AUM faster than ETH says a lot. Institutions don’t chase hype, they move where the fundamentals are strongest. XRP is finally getting the recognition its tech has deserved for years. And now everyone is talking about the FLR rewards too. I actually hold some XRP myself, where do I even check if I’m eligible to claim mine?