Thread

🛡️
Article header

The Value-for-Value Paradox: Why We’re All Hypocrites About Zaps

We treat zaps differently than every other purchase, hoarding sats for “future value” while freely spending on coffee and Netflix. If content is worth $1 to you right now, zap the equivalent in today’s sats and stop doing mental gymnastics about what they might be worth later. Value-for-value means paying for value in the present, not extracting free content while pretending you’re being strategic.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Published:

Stop thinking about zaps as “giving away future profits.” You’re paying for value you’re getting RIGHT NOW. If a post is worth $1 to you today, zap the equivalent. You wouldn’t wait to pay for coffee until “BTC pumps.” Value for value, not value for maybe-future-value.

Let’s get uncomfortable for a minute.

We’ve created this bizarre mental accounting system where we treat zaps fundamentally different from every other transaction in our lives. You’ll spend $6 on coffee without blinking. You’ll pay $15 for Netflix you barely watch. You’ll tip a bartender 20% for pouring liquid into a glass. But zap someone who just gave you a genuinely valuable idea, made you laugh, or taught you something? Suddenly we’re doing complex financial modeling about opportunity costs and future BTC price predictions.

The mental gymnastics are wild. “These 1,000 sats might be worth $10 someday, so I better hold onto them,” but that post you just read and screenshot? That idea you’re about to use in your own work? That moment of entertainment or insight? That’s worth $0 right now in your mental ledger.

Here’s the truth bomb: If you’re not willing to zap for value you’re actively consuming, you don’t actually believe in value-for-value. You believe in value-for-free with virtue signaling.

The Absurdity Test

Think about how insane this would sound in any other context. “I really loved that meal, but I’m not tipping the waiter because this $5 could be worth $50 if I invest it properly.” Or “Great haircut, but I’m going to skip paying because this $40 might appreciate if I put it in index funds.” How about “Thanks for the coffee, but technically this $6 could compound over 30 years, so I’m gonna need this one for free.”

We’d rightfully call this person a cheapskate with delusions of being a financial strategist. Yet this is EXACTLY the logic we use with zaps.

When HODL Culture Goes Wrong

The HODL mentality has broken our value calibration. Bitcoin taught us to think long-term. To delay gratification. To stack sats and hold through volatility. These are genuinely valuable lessons. But we’ve overcorrected into absurdity. We’re so focused on the future value of our sats that we’ve forgotten how to honestly assess the present value of what we’re consuming.

Here’s a framework that might hurt: Every time you consume content without zapping, ask yourself whether you would steal this if it were a physical product. Would you walk out of a bookstore with a book that gave you that much value? Would you dine and dash after a meal that satisfied you that much? Would you sneak into a movie that entertained you that much? No? Then why are you doing the digital equivalent?

“But it’s different, they chose to post it publicly for free!” Did they though? They posted it on a VALUE-FOR-VALUE network. Nostr isn’t Twitter. There’s no ad revenue. No algorithm farming. No corporate sponsor. The entire social contract of Nostr is built on the idea that if you receive value, you give value back. That’s not charity. That’s not tipping. That’s THE MODEL.

The Coffee Shop Test

You know what’s really telling? Most of us spend more on coffee in a day than we zap in a month. A single medium latte equals 15,000 to 20,000 sats at current prices. That’s potentially 20+ meaningful zaps to creators who actually provided you value. But we don’t think twice about the coffee because it’s “normal” spending, while the zaps feel like “giving away money.” The coffee is gone in 20 minutes and literally becomes piss. The post you read might change your perspective for years. Which one deserves your sats more?

The Creator Economy Death Spiral

Here’s what actually happens when everyone “waits for the pump” to be generous. Creators burn out and leave during bear markets. The platform fills with low-effort content from people who don’t need the money. By the time the pump comes, the good creators are gone. You’re left zapping shitcoiners and grifters who showed up for bull market clout. You’re not being strategic by holding your sats. You’re being penny wise and pound foolish. You’re optimizing for the wrong variable.

The Psychology of Stinginess

The truth is, we’re not actually doing sophisticated economic analysis when we skip zapping. We’re just being loss-averse in a really dumb way. Behavioral economics has shown this forever: humans feel the pain of loss roughly 2x more than the pleasure of equivalent gains. So we’re not thinking “this content is worth $1 to me.” We’re thinking “giving up these sats feels like losing future gains.” Loss aversion kicks in, and suddenly we’re rationalizing why we should consume value without reciprocating.

But here’s the kicker: You’re already losing. You’re losing the compounding returns of a healthy creator ecosystem. You’re losing the trust and reciprocity that makes Nostr different. You’re losing the moral high ground to criticize Web2 extractive platforms while being extractive yourself.

The Solution Is Simple

Stop checking BTC price before zapping. Seriously. It’s irrelevant. Instead, ask yourself ONE question: “What would I pay for this if it was behind a paywall and I couldn’t access it otherwise?” That insightful thread that taught you something? Probably worth $1 to $5. That meme that made you actually laugh out loud? Maybe $0.25. That long-form post you read all the way through and screenshot? Definitely worth $2 to $3. That announcement that saved you time or money? Could be worth $10 or more.

Convert that to sats at TODAY’s price. Zap it. Move on. Don’t think about what those sats might be worth in 2030. Think about what that value is worth to you in 2025. Right now. In the present moment where you actually received it.

The Ultimate Irony

We’re all on Nostr because we believe in decentralization, sovereignty, and breaking free from extractive platforms. But then we turn around and extract value from creators without reciprocating because we’re too busy calculating our personal moon math. We’ve become the very thing we sought to destroy, just with better technology and more sophisticated rationalizations.

Value for value doesn’t mean “value for value when it’s convenient” or “value for value after BTC hits $500k.” It means value for value. Present tense. Right now. If the content had value, zap it. If it didn’t, scroll past. But don’t consume value and then perform mental gymnastics about why you get to keep your sats.

That’s not strategy. That’s just being cheap with extra steps. ⚡💜

Replies (6)

🛡️
you're wrong, I'm not going to zap a note 1 dollar or more, I normally zap 21 sats or less, I did zap 1 dollar in the past but very rarely do I zap big zaps, I am not here to make anyone rich, the CEO of nostr tried convincing us to zap big amounts regularly instead of little amounts but it didn't work. If people start zapping big amounts all the time, it's going to cut into their savings, especially in a time when the fiat system keeps us poor, and many won't zap as much. I can zap as much as I want because 21 sats isn't very much. When nostr has millions of billions of users then those tiny zaps are going to equal a crazy big amount of money but since nostr is small then for some it feels like those tiny zaps are not worth it and they will quit nostr. People who buy expensive coffee are probably a majority on blue sky, my advice to noatrichs is pay yourself first, and save as much as you can, make ur own coffee and don't be crazy on the zaps. even if someone zaps 1 sat to me, I value that zap, I don't need big zaps and I'm not here to get rich
↩ replying to mar
Exactly. The whole premise is wrong and misconceived. Nostr is about expression. People were not blogging and publishing on the internet to get rich, and people are not writing on Nostr to get rich. Value for Value is a bonus, it is a great concept that makes this network better than others, but getting mad that you were not zapped a dollar for what you wrote is just insane. The idea that you implicitly owe someone for reading their content, and that if you don't pay it's stealing, is so wrong and goes completely against the ethos of the protocol, the idea of the internet, and the idea of open source. The entitlement and the hubris OP has in thinking people have to do mental gymnastics to avoid paying is just laughable. There are ways to put content behind a paywall on Nostr, there is no barrier to creating DRM-protected notes. I think he should try those instead of crying that people are HODLing wrong. By the way, I'm like you. I zap 21 sats regularly. Sometimes I will do 210, but that is about it. The whole “social contract of Nostr” is such bullshit. He really got my gears grinding...
I'm sorry to inform you, but if I accept your logic here, you actually owe me 2.1k sats or maybe even more. I read this whole long-form post, and boy, it was painful... Such nonsense.
I agree with you on some points; however, the phenomenon of not sending zaps because people think it will increase value is not stinginess — it’s rational. It’s not like your example about not spending because I could invest instead; this is about money being deflationary and being the best money ever created, so it becomes clear in our minds how much it’s actually worth. For that reason it’s important to spend wisely and on things that are truly valuable. In that sense, people might not see a reason to send a few zaps for good content out of habit — until recently they were used to mainstream social networks where the algorithm decides content and visibility, where they are the product consuming targeted ads; their value is determined by how long you spend watching something, good or bad. Your screen time watching something that doesn’t deserve 1 sat will get the same attention as something that deserved 10k. Here, in the free land, that doesn’t exist: if you liked something you need to pay for what you liked if you want to genuinely support good content. Zap good content and spend wisely.