Thread

Replies (13)

if the provider only provides superficial riches, then that will be the greed you instill in your partner as a means to get your attention. and because superficial richness is unfulfilling, the excessive focus on it degrades into lack of nurture, understanding, softness; the result is forcing, violence, abuse, cruelty. a partnership is not about riches. it is about shared wealth. trust means you share without focusing on the greed. riches is metallic mind. wealth is a warm heart. simple.
📇⬇️ policy: the entire conversation fixates on the incorrect set of problems. more subsidies solve nothing in a private market bloated with corruption, wealth, and a lack of moveable value channels flowing out of their systems. the other problem is: many apparently wealthy corporations have 2 sets of books and their actual value is significantly lower than their assumed cap which is based on crypto factors. none of that matters at all to individuals caught in white black and wet markets barely able to stay afloat. snap is irrelevant if subsidized corporate food drug and grocery were subject to fair pricing and if workers made a livable minimum wage; and if citizens realize their subsidized private corporate lives are actually tax funded laundry. View quoted note →
the free market also selects oversized monopolies to fail (not just products) when demand for systems erodes. which includes social systems that collapse on themselves like communism (which is not an economy). the problem with manipulated demand cycles for pre-determined supply is buyer distaste plus poverty resulting from buyer's pumps, accumulated debt, and bad products. eventually no amount of pressure to fomo buy extracts excitement from an impoverished market. you are here. ✌🏻