Thread

I like the baby icons in C

I like C , it's kind in between layout readibility and 9 posts per page ... :)

I like revamp D the best. Seems like it makes the best use of the space.

i'm so bullshit on this

Go nuts: D.

I am confused @miljan 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Revamp B for everything except the font-size and line-height. I love the readability of the current font-size and line-height. Don't like the container for D or the tiny avatars in C.

Sparse is better imo

Indeed in the "current" version the line height is too tall. I would offer a preference: * Standard (A), but increasing the font-size ~20% * Compact (C) This way you also please those who want a slightly larger font. The D is a good alternative to C but the space really saved is strongly related to the presence of images, and the left empty space is not so useful.

# Revamp D it's the best of all

C View quoted note →

more parts per millionth

Any but D. Look at all that wasted space under each profile pic 💀

C because of the profile pics being smaller (they contain less info and can be recognized at a glance). Content itself still has the full width 👌. Lineheight is a bit off though and the margins/passings are not consistent yet.

Idk idk but just not the rere in D

Won’t load no matter the platform or hardware

C

D

D

D

I like D because of the clear section separation thanks to avatars. C is ok height wise

B or A. Have all of those, but let users pick between them in settings.

C

Let me pick between A, C and D but adjust the font size to my liking. This is coming from a visually impaired guy constantly using screen magnification: The ability to adjust font sizes is an insane help as we can now match how far we scroll our magnifier versus how much information we can guess from a glance without. On Element on my Android phone, I have a much bigger font size, so I can skim messages for words by their optic. If I am interested, I can zoom in with the screen magnifier and read. Since the font is bigger, I don't have to zoom in far to read it well, but still have enough density that I have to move the view a little. I wouldn't neccessarily call this an "accessibility killer feature", but definitively something I would absolutely want. Thanks for reading!

Make sure to test with 5+ reposts of the Nostr Report, and a handful of other notes in between them. ;)

Last one feels best. Side note, when zooming in this image in primal, you can’t really zoom in it’s a pain viewing it on mobile

Looks good! 👍

C

C

A

B or C ... full width images/video, please!

D

D

C/D But why no slider? It's also screen resolution and device font size dependent.

Cool !!

Proportions and spacing on Revamp C are just right 👌

Dobro je!

Liking the compactness and clarity of the smaller icon in C. Definitely not D

As much as I love information density, I think B is the perfect balance.