Knowledge is freedom. Modern scientific publishing is a shitcoin. Decentralized publishing is future.
Please repost ππ»π«π
TL;DR
Yesterday I spent 5 very productive hours during the flight. As some of you know already, my job and my passion is science. Besides doing fundamental research on a daily basis, I have to interact with the modern system of scientific publishing in order to create milestones and make my ideas supported by evidence accessible to the broader community. And oh boy, thereβs only one thing that is worse than publishing a paper nowadays if you are a scientist like me, and that is applying for research grants to secure funding (but thatβs a different topic).
The more I explore the #Bitcoin & #Nostr universe, the more I understand how, and more importantly, WHY these ecosystems are and will be so self-sufficient and self-sustainable in the long run. The decentralized protocol and PoW-based consensus rules lead to two key emergent phenomena: (1) trustless user<->protocol<->network communication; and (2) unambiguous proof of ownership. THIS is exactly what scientific publishing is still lacking despite a few recent attempts to improve the situation such as pre-print servers, public licenses, open review and Sci-Hub, just to name a few.
It goes without saying that the system in which a few big publishers that can install paywalls, pre-select scientific reviewers, reject manuscripts without sending to peer review leads nowhere. It allows the publishers to manipulate the society by (a) privatizing and misusing the copyrights; (b) downplaying some studies in favor of the others. It does NOT mean they always do this, but you will probably agree that having such a βbackdoorβ is dangerous. The copyrights, and thus the freedom to propagate scientific knowledge, should belong only and only to those who have carried out a research study. At the same time, every expert should have the freedom to criticize a study of interest, thus validating or invalidating its conclusions.
Iβve been working on a proposal for how the system can be improved by adopting the core principles underlying the #bitcoin and #nostr protocols. Although I mentioned it to a few plebs here on nostr privately, I now realize that I should systematize my ideas in a written form and share them with the nostr community. It will take time for me to accomplish this task and produce nice figures. And so I would be really happy you could share your ideas on the topic and/or repost this note π«π
#plebchain #plebs #grownostr #nostrdev #devs #bitcoin
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Thank you for this contribution π«‘ππ«
π«π«π«ππ«‘
I appreciate what you have said, and hope to refine it slightly?
Paul the Ambassador of Christ warned his student Timothy of "knowledge falsely so called." We saw a *lot* of that kind of thing during the covid plandemic. Trust "the science" we were told while lies about the efficacy of masks and "safe and effective" injections were promulgated.
So I'd say that it's truth we're starving for, or perhaps battle-tested knowledge. I couldn't agree more that we need to eliminate the existing centralized gatekeepers that have monied interest in suppressing that truth.
Jesus said that it's truth that sets us free. The scientific method constantly questions, evaluates, corrects, and refines our understanding of the amazing creation we live in. True knowledge of the workings of that creation benefit us greatly, and I applaud your efforts to make research and publication and genuine interaction among scientists the uncensored, unfettered norm.πππππ―βΌοΈ
I look forward to reading the ideas and proposals for improved scientific publishing that @Maxim is working on!
πππππππ
View quoted note β