Thread

One day, it would be nice to see a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves if they saw that people need a license to transmit money, or that the government thinks it has the right to surveil and censor everyone’s money and transactions. The default is privacy. To infringe on someone’s privacy should require probable cause and come with checks and balances. Ubiquitous surveillance shouldn’t be the default, since it enables tyranny. image

Replies (51)

🛡️
Gotta seperate money and state.
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
One day, it would be nice to see a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves if they saw that people need a license to transmit money, or that the government thinks it has the right to surveil and censor everyone’s money and transactions. The default is privacy. To infringe on someone’s privacy should require probable cause and come with checks and balances. Ubiquitous surveillance shouldn’t be the default, since it enables tyranny. image
View quoted note →
🛡️
Yes. This is why CBDC and/or PPDC (public/private) is being pushed. It's about control. We're dealing with central bankers and powerful families/groups behind the scenes who are tyrants. All the while, many are here acting as if it's just some "wayward" politicians/bankers. These politicians and low-rung bankers are just being controlled by central bankers who want total control. Don't submit. Read: The Creature from Jekyll Island. "Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you out!" Andrew Jackson
You need standing to challenge. And, to have standing you need to be in jail. The Samourai people may not be heroes, but they are victims, are Bitcoiners, and have standing. Why not make this our hill? I’m ready to put my money where my mouth is and I’m sure others are as well.
Totally agree!
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
One day, it would be nice to see a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves if they saw that people need a license to transmit money, or that the government thinks it has the right to surveil and censor everyone’s money and transactions. The default is privacy. To infringe on someone’s privacy should require probable cause and come with checks and balances. Ubiquitous surveillance shouldn’t be the default, since it enables tyranny. image
View quoted note →
Preach 💜✊🧡
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
One day, it would be nice to see a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves if they saw that people need a license to transmit money, or that the government thinks it has the right to surveil and censor everyone’s money and transactions. The default is privacy. To infringe on someone’s privacy should require probable cause and come with checks and balances. Ubiquitous surveillance shouldn’t be the default, since it enables tyranny. image
View quoted note →
The #Founding #Hypocrites would be rejoicing, realising how many "#rights" they gave their political descendants. They obviously have "the right" to do whatever they want, because they are doing this and countless other injustices. A #gangsterment started as a series of crimes under laws of the day and a fraudulent document, can do anything the same way: The #Quash: The fundamental #fraud of the #Constitution Episode webpage: https://the-quash.captivate.fm/episode/the-fundamental-fraud-of-the-constitution Media file: #USA #UK #Idiocracy #WARshington #DistrictOfCriminals
#Bitcoin still holding its month long ascending triangle of Teasing breakouts.Still expecting a break out to the upside of $63-70k post-halving Now is the best time accumulate more using sophisticated algorithm tools and strategy for longterm adoption. If you haven’t join the (RCL) yet, the time is now, you can easily flip over 100x ROI using this effective strategy. Vip group: Source:
Sadly, the fiat system is secured only through surveillance and threats of violence to punish abuse Get rid of surveillance and the banking system is no longer "secure" If only there were a financial system that was secured by something virtuous instead of punitive
In Europe there is now a cash limit of up to EUR 10,000. Above EUR 3,000, you have to prove your identity. Thanks to inflation, these limits measured in terms of real purchasing power will decrease all by themselves over time. In case of gold, for example, this limit used to be EUR 1,999.99 in the past. A few years ago, an anonymous purchase of 1oz was still possible. Thanks to inflation, this no longer the case.
What about using a Private Membership Association PMA structure along with 508 c1a in the US to help provide protection now? We don’t need permission. It’s a constitutional right. It’s an unalienable human right to have and practice privacy
The West is hijacked by Wall Street mafia.
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
One day, it would be nice to see a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves if they saw that people need a license to transmit money, or that the government thinks it has the right to surveil and censor everyone’s money and transactions. The default is privacy. To infringe on someone’s privacy should require probable cause and come with checks and balances. Ubiquitous surveillance shouldn’t be the default, since it enables tyranny. image
View quoted note →
Monero is a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. Don't be strong in words and weak in actions. Use the tools to challenge the state.
Lyn Alden's avatar Lyn Alden
One day, it would be nice to see a well-capitalized challenge to the Bank Secrecy Act on 4th amendment grounds. The Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves if they saw that people need a license to transmit money, or that the government thinks it has the right to surveil and censor everyone’s money and transactions. The default is privacy. To infringe on someone’s privacy should require probable cause and come with checks and balances. Ubiquitous surveillance shouldn’t be the default, since it enables tyranny. image
View quoted note →