Press the zap button more often.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (42)
Challenge accepted π«‘β‘οΈ
Okay
Zapping will one day be as ubiquitous as βGoogle itβ
Gosh. First time Iβve thought & written that. But deep down I know it will be true
MASSIVE innovation
What a time to be getting involved
You are already surprised about a prediction that did not yet come true?
Goosebumps!
Fortune teller π
no u
Whoa, "non-zapping"
Pretty cool stuff!
It would be nice to have a one button client β‘
I enabled tor on everything and zapped you a few thousand sats.
Did you get them?
Cheers
Now? No :( did the progress circle finish?
Ups! Got it!
I sent 4444 sats.
I got it :)
Post valuable content more often, and we have a deal.
Eu pressiono e Γ s vezes pressiono atΓ© em uma nota prΓ³pria que eu fiz. Logo minha sugestΓ£o Γ©: nΓ£o mostrar para mim o botΓ£o do zap nas minhas notas.
Manda o ZAP pra mim πΏ
I would remove the emoji button if you made it an option. I use zaps as a 'like' button anyway. Boost and zap is all I need.
I like about the reactions, that it is about expressing my emotion to the post.
I didn't say anything about your use of them did I? I said I would remove them in my settings. I don't use them. I have no issue with other people using them. They are just a useless distraction in my UI.
we need a term for when a post gets more zaps than likes.
golden ratio? idk
View quoted note β
mas despacio amigo/ still setting up to catchup
That is the way! Just zapped you π§‘π Thank you for your work and commitment!
looks like it's working
ZAP


I don't think mine is working
there should be an inter-zap competition
When zapping a post what is the minimum? Or is it based on the individuals stack size etc�
Correct. Stack size plays a role.
Amount of value received
Depth of relationship.
Not being a cheapskate π€£
I factor all of those in.
Most Iβve given (mostly due to limited sats as I just joined #nostr ) is 1k
Smallest Iβve given is 24 (off top of my head)
I like that listβ¦I also think that maybe we havenβt wrapped our heads around absolute scarcity and future purchasing power
The trend is moving towards
1 Sat = 1$ ( when 1 Sat = 2$? !!! )
Could make Nostr a very interesting place!;)
@npub15a0k...8avp #thanks for the #zap
While the trend may be moving that direction, that is ~1636x from where we currently are.
1 sat = $2 in theory is 2x thatβ¦
Issue is itβs a multi variable equation because the math I just presented assume the fiat value against which we are measuring also remains constantβ¦which it is not.
Thatβs why a lot of #btc maxiβs (but not exclusively #bitcoin hard liners) are proponents of
1 BTC = 1 BTC
And thus
1 sat = 1 sat
I think that is how we must begin to think about value because then it truly is exponential and not detrimental.
To your point; 1 sat probably will equate to multiples when measured in fiat.
Personally I hope to be off the fiat train at that pointβ¦but it will be tricky depending on the current unknowns .
I havenβt yet dove into full on self custody of energy for exampleβ¦still have to pay fiat for the electricity π€ͺ
endorsed!! (for me too)
Working on this.
In fact just yesterday I was looking at my wallet balance and said to myself
βJeeshβ¦some people have been generous to meβ¦I need to be generous to!β
β¦and off to #zap I went!
same here! π
@Vitor Pamplona #thanks for the #zap
Inspiring!
You make it back home safely I assume?
I'd argue that you should only Zap Empathy that is Immutable. Otherwise, you promote Fake Empathy at no cost.
Nostr is not Bitcoin which gains Immutable Truth at a cost. Nostr and Bitcoin are similar but different, so different asks are required because.
