Thread

🛡️
Yeah but if time is not continuous the entire formalism collapses. All of physics would need to be reformulated according. So where is your proof that time is continuous to say all of this is inevitable? All models presuppose and require continuous time. You’re right that betting against a process is misguided. The process we’re in the middle of discovering is that Bitcoin is the measurable object of time. Each block is a quantized, discrete unit produced through irreversible work via entropy and energy. Fundamental thermodynamics. There are no intermediate states, no fractional causality. Cause and effect in Bitcoin are discretized. That alone is a revelation for science. Bitcoin demonstrates quantized causality in a working, global system. Once causality is quantized, time is no longer a smooth backdrop, it is constructed. If time is constructed, then physics doesn’t sit beneath it; physics emerges after it. Your entire ontology of physics/science is betting against Bitcoin, when the proof stares at you in the face. I can’t tell if you can’t see it, or just don’t want to 🫡

Replies (1)

Results of experiments speak louder than words. I trust the results of experiments, conducted by reputable teams, all over the world, and reproduced multiple times, and published in great detail—more than your words.