Thread

🛡️
“Sats” has to be explained. “Bitcoin” does not. People will need Bitcoin and they’ll see numbers on the screen. That’s it. If you think sats is the word used long term, you haven’t made that connection yet or you have an anchoring bias.

Replies (29)

🛡️
Sorry, but that's the fiat "UX understanding" of Big Tech and platform business, where you keep users stupid and inactive by "abstracting away complexity". But bitcoin isn't a platform. It's a protocol. The rules of the game are different here. The UX is also different because the "user" journey is different. Bitcoin is different. That’s the point. Sats the standard.
🛡️
Again, I think they will not want to deal with learning a second term because they have other really important things in their life that they’re also trying to learn about. To use sats, they have to hear Bitcoin. I think for many people, the learning will stop at Bitcoin and sats won’t have a chance to permeate.
🛡️
In better times, people were embarrassed not to know the right terms. Now everyone is screaming "customer experience" and "inclusivity" and whatnot. Thank God for bitcoin, because in a bitcoin future, you work on understanding and naming things correctly, or you're just #hfsp It's not that you're wrong. It's just that you're working from different premises, and I think those premises are wrong because bitcoin dgaf.