freezing or seizing old addresses as part of a ‘quantum hard fork’ is a non starter
never going to happen, nor should it
quantum risk is theoretical, any protocol changes should do no harm
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
So many new people in Bitcoin and here we are…debunking all the FUD all over again. Jesus Christ, do people read anymore? So much content out there on quantum! Watching Antman and The Wasp: Quantumania for starters.
Do no harm plz
View quoted note →
If protecting Bitcoin requires violating self-custody or rewriting history, it’s not protection. It’s abandonment of first principles.
feels like this would be a mistake and antithetical to base principles
Absolutely- you always correctly preach that everybody has to think about their own threat model in Bitcoin. This would include the OG address holders as well.
Why? The Nostr interface isn't very user-friendly right now, but the project is literally in its infancy; we're witnessing the beginning of a possible new era of social networking...