Thread

Replies (78)

Not true. As a regular user its much more practical, convenient to use my PC when i dont use it or even say let 30% of the cpu work for monero. With BTC you need special hardware mainly from china. Bullshit warranty, wait time, manipulation, TAX and postage .....so much crap just to mine. With regular hardware anyone can buy its doable for everyone. I rather have milljons of people support the network than hundreds with their farms. But that's me.
Likewise, what a load of crap! I don't care much for "earning" but more about supporting the network. And as anything Monero just as well as Bitcoin can and will be used by criminals. So what? Are you saying none of the BTC miners is part of criminal organisation? Yeah right! Be delusional and support big corps line Antminer who scam everyone with their miner each time. Either way privacy by default is the way to go!
I do like Bitcoin but i would have preferred it was hardware that was more accessible. Next the lack of privacy is crap. That is one reason i rather use Monero or LTC with MW. What your lacking to understand is that LN which everyone seem to promote is the definition of centralization. Same with Asic mining. How many companies can afford the big farms ?? Not many i bet and it just became even more expensive for them,,,,
Like I said you're a communist, Rather than relish competition, actual free market competition - you want the protocol to basically be for basement dwellers as you can't mine it meaningfully. If I want to mine pennies worth of bitcoin I can do that too with readily available hardware. Idk how this a point you guys try and make, it's a dumb point for people sipping dumbfuckjuice.
Its very simple, we need low power miners for at home mining. I can't run a 3kW miner at home, the power bill would dox me and I can't afford it. Even a 1kW miner would be a stretch, it'd be a huge increase to my usage. I need something in the range of 500W with reasonable efficiency, meaning if newer miners are running 3kW at 110-150 the, I need something close to 15tH. Now we just needs $10'sM...
We need to decentralize mining. I know its not obvious, but relying on these big pools is a vector of attack for bitcoin. I'm certain today's chip makers could make usb asic sticks like the blockeruptors of old. 200,000 people each running a usb asic at 5-10gh/s and linked to an independent pool could make a difference https://snort.social/e/nevent1qqsyfz9a0c4qtr8dk4pvyr9f50u74vzd8m3a8kl5qusnac582hs4t8sppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5pzql2se2xpv7sswg7zftafl6dvw9cdcn2uqqxhln28p3dweall8t4hqvzqqqqqqyew6plx
You are calling bitcoin decentralized virtual crypto currency, but obvious problem is seeing that whole mining system is centralized and it critically depends on huge technical things that must be powered by electricity that is centralized system too. Bitcoin is moving into trap. Proof of work consensus is moving into trap. It is bullshit to tell that you can keep on renewables and your own sources, those big ones already have you in trap. Stories about decentralized bitcoin are just fairytales. Col delegated proof of stake consensus into mining pools would represent mamy times more protection for bitcoin than this, those like nodes would be able to run anywhere powered just by sun and 100% protected from censorship.
what are these miners getting in exchange? what's incentivising them not to switch? There are 2016 blocks every 2 weeks, surely income stability can't be a factor especially if you're a public miner and report quarterly earnings - even if you're a 1% hashrate pool that's about 262 blocks in a Q with reasonable certainty and even a chance of being lucky and getting more.