This is all poetry.
You don't have any equation as far as I can see through your hundreds of posts. Is this new physics? Equation-less? Like server-ess.
Give me 1 equation that you've come up to support your theory that somewhere between 100 logical qubits (which is proven to exist) and ~2000 logical qubits (which is geometrically proven to crack ECDSA) there is some impossible obstacle. Or one experiment design.
Anything but more poetry.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (1)
I’m looking forward to the day that all these QC companies actually release a system in the wild (universally accessible) that solves a real problem or problems.
Not “financial portfolio optimisation” or other impossible to validate (and civilisation-ally meaningless) claims.
If a100stable qubit QC applications are ALREADY changing the world for the better, where can I buy one and what could it do?
When I read the press releases of all these “credible” sources pumping their own QC bags, I get the sense they are written by Silicon Valley/Wall St marketing departments.
I’m not the only one. There are many many thoughtful people asking these same questions.
Where is the “quantum” breakthrough of important and useful APPLICATIONS? All the press seems to be focused on the promises of such applications in the future. Are we there yet? Or is 100qubits not sufficient for any REAL innovation?
Pls don’t respond angrily. Skepticism is good. Especially in novel industries that have failed to deliver on past promises and time frames.
(Follow solid/semi-solid state battery development if you want another)
PS
Even the most dumbed down LLM query offers the same skepticism. So I don’t think I’m being absurd in asking the question.

