Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
good from far... far from good
Shitmouth about shitcoin.
๐คก๐คก
๐คฆโโ๏ธ๐คฆโโ๏ธ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Does Bitcoin care tho??
SURPRISED?
nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpwy9rgrdl4uafr7ry535590f534r9gyc92prk4xdlqj3fwd3yzapqqsta870z3ksyt8nkt04drc33n4w0wdq0qy3krhmyn0krfwuxx6scvqua99gr
Should we tell him?
Shitty shitcoiners ๐ฆ
LOL WBTC the participation trophy of Bitcoin, Saylor grasping at straws, until BitGo releases the UTXOs it ain't no BTC
The difference a single W makes. Turns the whole thing into a major L
A shitcoin will always be a shitcoin.
Donโt waste your time and energy on it.
Gay
Wbtc lol total shitcoiner
Tomatoes tamatoesโฆ..
Yeah that doesn't count
Somebody should ask Saylor what he means when he saysโฆ
โThere is no second best.โ
Not even real Bitcoin. We are witnessing the shitcoin-phase we all have been through.
GuttenTag!!
โ๏ธ๐ฟ Directly from the new President and his Maxi Sponsor, Saylor:
"Shitcoins = GOOD" ๐
"#Bitcoin = What is that?" ๐ฎโ๐จ
it's very disappointing ๐
I have reply guy-ed you in the past regarding Saylor. Today I cannot defend him. Fair play. This is bullshit.
They bought ethereum. Can someone tell that gigachad what they bought. He sooooo smart he called wbtc bitcoin when its ethereum what the hell i thought he was smart
If wBTC really is BTC locked up in a smart contract, I'm actually more comfortable than most with this being "real".
There is some utility in being able to do everything on a single chain from a single address. I still think it's gross and they should have bought real Bitcoin, but I'm vaguely open to being proven wrong
what do you mean by โdoing everything?โ what more do you need to do besides use freedom money and save that value sovereignly over time? the only other โthingโ you can be doing is shitcoining and rugging on a centrally controlled chain.
Yes. Those other things.
I'm not saying I approve of that other stuff. I'm saying if you wanted to do "all of the above" (including buy BTC via shit chain) then it makes strategic sense to minimize chain operations and use a single (ethereum) address.
Also: I can be a Bitcoin maxi while also accepting that Ethereum isn't a "centrally controlled chain". PoS is inferior to PoW for the purpose of building sound money, but Ethereum is still decentralized.
I'd argue that there is less utility.
Why is that?
the Ethereum Foundation has literally forked the chain in the past to โundoโ transactions they didnโt like. itโs a centralized chain lmao.
Open source software forks. That's kind of the point. It's up to the users to follow or not. You know Bitcoin has done the same right?
Because why would you want to swap out of bitcoin? It is pristine permanent capital. There is no reason to trade it.
For liquidity in a bullshit casino where you hope to 10x and then swap back into even more Bitcoin?
I'm not saying I recommend it, but it's not a foregone conclusion that it's the root of all evil.
You might equally say to Saylor: "why bother with all this equity and dollar shit, just buy Bitcoin with what's in your pockets". This isn't to say that Saylor is the ideal model, but maybe you see my point.
Fun fact, all forks are open source. Spoons as well.
if you canโt see the difference between a foundation controlling and pushing the soft forks through vs. the way Bitcoin consensus works (i.e. Blocksize wars) I donโt have the time to convince you, sorry.
Pathetic
what would you expect from a company that launches memecoins of Trump family ๐คท
*wrapped bitcoin + many shitcoins
๐ wtf Saylor
The irony ๐น
CHILDREN IN SUITS
Sad
Thatโs not Bitcoin. If Saylor thinks that is Bitcoin, what has he actually been buying.
but more than 47M in shitcoins
Seems like 100% shitcoins to me.
you are damn right ๐๐ฟ
Serious question. What chain does @jack mallers #Strike use for it's #tether integration? #Liquid? #ETH? I honestly don't know.
I have LONG noticed we have different standards for our 'heroes'.
People who think in polarities (black and white) tend to be bad judges.
And full disclosure for those same people... I threw up in my mouth a little when I read about the wBTC purchase.
High time preference. High time preference everywhere.
๐ซก
Imagine Saylor had almost half a million wrapped shitcoins. ๐คฃ๐คฃ Plonker!
Wild times
Observe what they DO not what they SAY
What the heck is wBTC??? ๐คจ
Wrapped BTC. Itโs a shitcoin representation of Bitcoin on the ETH blockchain. Some other institution takes real Bitcoin and gives you back terrible wBTC
Soโฆ Mikey, ya see that w at the beginning of the BTC right thereโฆ
Not a great take by Saylor but then again heโs comfortable owning ious.
HAS MSTR BEEN BUYING wBTC THROUGH COINBASE THE WHOLE TIME?!!
I would be mind blown
Wutโฆ. ๐๐๐
Owch
Either die a hero or live long enough to become a villain.
Would be absolutely insane dude! How can he possibly tweet something like this?
Broโฆ the man is an absolute wild card
I am prepared for my heroโs to become villains. But for them to never have been a hero in the first place. I would be impressed
Yeahโฆ that would be next level. I just canโt believe Saylor would be that stupidโฆ unless heโs being engineered to take the fall in the next bear market.
I think this could be game theory. Itโs going to confuse a lot of people and nations and give the US more time to buy or pass a bill. Maybe. Just maybe. But Iโm biased
This is both my hope and fear. The Shitcoiner-in-Chief is going to cause many to FOMO into shitcoins. This might stave off the price of bitcoin from rocketing just a little bit longer, giving people more time to stack before then.
All shitcoins. I canโt see bitcoin on the list.
๐คก
Shit who could have seen the grifters grifting
Hopefully gets community noted.
I don't understand Saylors agenda โฆ
They didnโt buy BTC. They bought a lot of token vouchers to redeem BTC that hopefully they will exercise.
Not different, really, from what Microstrategy itself usually buys... ๐
๐ฟ
Out of curiosity.. does Microstrategy do proof of reserves? ๐
๐๏ธ๐คฎ๐๏ธ
Oh Lord who convinced them to go with wBTC ๐ The rugpull will be astronomical
The people lobbying are focused on promoting their own platformsโthis is politics. Michael, on the other hand, is simply trying to educate them about Bitcoin, a powerful tool. However, in reality, things arenโt strictly black and white; there are nuances and complexities.
Letโs see how that works out ๐คฃ