Thread

Replies (35)

@Gigi but here he seems to have changed his mind. From 2 mins he explains his opinion of Bitcoin. Previously he’s said though that he believes in flexible money and credit creation.
🛡️
Nice, thanks! I will check it out. Also, would love if you were able to compress your podcasts down to 100mb and post them on Plebs. Or, maybe did more shortened versions that you could then link the YouTube video if people wanted to see the whole video. This way people who don't want to use Google services could instead use Nostr to watch some of it 😎
🛡️
Not entirely by choice 🥲 Plebs uploads the videos across numerous Blossom hosts, which most only support 100mb uploads. It's for good reason, as the hash generation would take an enormous time for larger files. Luckily, Plebs does have some auto compression that might work, but would suggest trying to compress it yourself first, if possible. Decentralization isn't always the best, but at least your video is spread across multiple hosts and if one goes down, the hash is used to fetch it from another.
Richard Werner taught me about City of London, how financial metrics can be misused to create narratives to mislead eg GDP, and he believes in lots of small, decentralized community banks. Helped me to understand the machinations of big banks and how they extract value (loot). My black pill moment is I'd like to find out the real story, behind the Bank Secrecy Act - because I believe thats where the real trouble lies. He's never expressed an opinion about BTC on any of the podcasts I've seen. Thank you for the Tucker Carlson link.
In this interview (July 2024) I’m asking him explicitly about bitcoin and his vision on more small community banks- challenging him with the fact that he’s essentially preaching for more fiat banks, and further fractional reserve banking and from his answer I felt like he doesn’t get Bitcoin, nor that he sees the issues/problems with excessive printing of fiat and fractional reserve / debt creation. I think it’s a bit strange to be honest. Also when Philip Bagus challenges his view, he calls it nonsense. Watch from minute 27:
Not the question but Phillip Bagus got purplepilled, even if not orangepilled. We live in a time of transition, between the times before Bitcoin and the time after. In decades we cross a divide and on both sides the other world feels so far away. Bitcoin is the technology but it's the people that matter and we can try to help the two worlds be seen at the same time
It seems he preliminarily touched bitcoin but does not fully get it, yet, so is a bit apprehensive. I think he just needs a few things cleared and he's be on fire about bitcoin. @Vlad's interview with him shows that towards the end. What's your assessment Vlad?