Thread - Hyper

has nothing to do with what I am saying. on the contrary, it's you and @Cyph3rp9nk who are asserting " no true Bitcoiner trusts cryptographic primitives to guarantee supply" I'm just pointing out that bitcoiners learned to use cryptography and that trend will just continue.

Replies (2)

ManyKeys 🛡️ 3 weeks ago

The fallacy applies because you’re redefining “Bitcoiners” and “Monero people” according to who agrees with your point. I’m describing protocol-level auditability; you’re shifting it to group identity and then excluding disagreement by redefining the group. That’s the No True Scotsman structure.

Hanshan 🛡️ 3 weeks ago

↩ replying to ManyKeys

the groups I'm defining are "people who trust cryptographic primitives to guarantee supply" ie Monero people and Bitcoin maxis who do not. I'm NOT establishing a purity test to define either group. therefore it is NOT a "no pure Scotsman" example. its just a point about the cultural movement towards trusting crypto over time. maybe respond to the point of the post rather that trying to make it about something else.