Thread

> We're are still at least tens of years away when there even could be enough cubits to brake SHA-256 and way before we'll just update the algorithm You have no idea. We could be 5 years away. Nobody can know what quantum breakthroughs will or will not happen. (That's true for AI also, which can support the error-correction side). The nature of unexpected research breakthroughs is that they are *unexpected*, and "It'll never happen in such and such a time" is not a very strong argument. Also to have any upgrade propagate widely enough to save bitcoin from a massive and potentially life-ending system shock we need at least 10 years of propagation, give how human nature impedes propagation. Maybe by 2035 the network will be hardened enough to survive the shock. None of those "features" you mentioned help avoid catastrophe by the way. A machine with enough q-bits will bulldoze in with ease. This is a real thing.

Replies (1)

🛡️
Sure, if you trust the physicists and the assumptions without proof of verification. But the physics of bitcoin disprove their models…specifically the modern definition of Superpostion, which breaks the theory of all CQC models. Bitcoin (and its physics) stand in direct defiance of this belief. The goal has always been to convince you otherwise. Your castle of cryptography is not safe anon!