“Hate speech” is a made up Marxist euphemism. A dog whistle for aspiring censors.
There is no such thing as hate speech. There is only speech that particular people don’t like.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (14)
Ok no this is straight up insanity. I don't like either side but this is absolutely gross 🤢 🤮
#freedomofspeech #dtom
#insanity #thisiswhynostr #grownostr #thisistheway #nostrorbust
#politics
#uspol
#politics
#uspol“Hate speech” is a made up Marxist euphemism. A dog whistle for aspiring censors.
There is no such thing as hate speech. There is only speech that particular people don’t like.
View quoted note →
"if you act like a megaphone for misinformation" 🤡
So she's turning hersef in?
Sounds like it! 😂
No. Not like this... not like this.
#whowatchesthewatchmen ?
“Hate speech” is a made up Marxist euphemism. A dog whistle for aspiring censors.
There is no such thing as hate speech. There is only speech that particular people don’t like.
View quoted note →
My brain processed "haccp" on that bord at first before reading.
There is hate speech and speech you hate. And they are not necessarily the same.
View quoted note →
Whose democracy is she speaking of?
Going after megaphone 📢 companies next, they have to be held responsible for the hate speech they amplify! 🤡
Co-incidentally wrote a note to that effect here:
Tl;DR - Sovereign control
Both Offence and Instructions are taken
Binding someone to hear or act is violence
"I was told to" has not been an excuse since Mai Lai / Nuremberg
Own your actions!

ZimFox
Free Speech and Free Listening are different. Taking offence is a decision At the core of human rights is sovereignty over the bo...
So is using 'Marxist' for everything that isn't right leaning.
Is she drunk again?
I think #kamala is right in some part as you are right in some part.
I think socialmedia which use algorythms to promote aggressive language, provocation with no other intention then to provoke someone, this does not add to free speech. It rather obligates people to read this in favor of decent more calm language.
But you are also right in the way, that hatespeech is defined from the reader and no objective measurement. And to defend democracy, we need to accept critique in all forms and allow bad language. It should rather be critiqued as well and be distrusted by the public instead of censoring it by police.
