MOST PEOPLE DO NOT ACTUALLY WANT FREE SPEECH.
MOST WANT THE OPINIONS THEY AGREE WITH TO ALWAYS BE THE LOUDEST.
FEW WILL ACTUALLY PUSH TECH FORWARD THAT ENABLES FREEDOM FOR THOSE THAT THEY DISAGREE STRONGLY.
FOCUS ON THE FEW. THE FEW WILL CHANGE THE WORLD.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (6)
the few are mostly very neutral in the first place
i have some fierce points on certain areas but i think the whole thing is you drift to the center of the compass if you honestly evaluate what is important
i never understood either side because they were always so unrealistic, always missing the "and then"
Very well said
Yeah, Free speech is important.
If a platform directly suppresses it then that's a problem.
However, if a platform gives its users the tools to do as they see fit with regards to what they see on their feeds, then I'm supportive of that.
Free speech debate is a distraction. We should be most concerned with free choice.
Marketing and advertising integration with these algorithms are making the end user the product. You have no choice of what you see and engage with.
#nostr fixes this.
I'm with @ODELL on this one.
MOST PEOPLE DO NOT ACTUALLY WANT FREE SPEECH.
MOST WANT THE OPINIONS THEY AGREE WITH TO ALWAYS BE THE LOUDEST.
FEW WILL ACTUALLY PUSH TECH FORWARD THAT ENABLES FREEDOM FOR THOSE THAT THEY DISAGREE STRONGLY.
FOCUS ON THE FEW. THE FEW WILL CHANGE THE WORLD.
View quoted note →