Thread

I can teach you how to turn your $300 into $6200 in just 4hours without interrupting your daily activities and it's 100% legitimate and secure TEXT ME IF YOU ARE INTERESTED FOR MORE INFORMATION WITH THE DETAILS TEXT NUMBER. +1 352778 0492 WHATSAPP NUMBER: +1 352778 0492 Email: w98701483@gmail.com Telegram: cello771

I can teach you how to turn your $300 into $6200 in just 4hours without interrupting your daily activities and it's 100% legitimate and secure TEXT ME IF YOU ARE INTERESTED FOR MORE INFORMATION WITH THE DETAILS TEXT NUMBER. +1 352778 0492 WHATSAPP NUMBER: +1 352778 0492 Email: w98701483@gmail.com Telegram: cello771

I can teach you how to turn your $300 into $6200 in just 4hours without interrupting your daily activities and it's 100% legitimate and secure TEXT ME IF YOU ARE INTERESTED FOR MORE INFORMATION WITH THE DETAILS TEXT NUMBER. +1 352778 0492 WHATSAPP NUMBER: +1 352778 0492 Email: w98701483@gmail.com Telegram: cello771

Running knots

Bitcoiners talking about conflict of interest again? I see another shism on the horizon. Also Blockstream was a big battle field of interest that got ignored by many.

So what’s their goal….remove the limits to make shitcoining on bitcoin a better experience? Just go use eth and sol..these people suck.

What a little cry baby he is

In fairness, just calling conflict of interest doesn't really argue for or against an idea. I don't think you should have been banned, but I would like to hear why the change is bad for Bitcoin (whatever that means to you). Conflict of interest isn't necessarily bad (I have a conflict of interest by just holding my wealth in Bitcoin), which is why I need a little more than that as an argument. I didn't see the whole exchange. Just going off what I see here.

I don't really agree with your point of view, nor do I agree with the Knots guy's ideas, this kind of behavior in a debate about something so contested is really detrimental to bitcoin

On a side note, it is interesting that something like Bitcoin is built, discussed, and maintained behind centralized walls. I get it earlier on because we didn't have options. But Google and Microsoft in 2025? For Bitcoin anything? Lol It seems to me that anyone who believes in the core principles of Bitcoin wouldn't want people to be able to be banned from the conversation. Individual mute seems reasonable.

I agree with this opinion.

sending support and running knots

Thanks for sharing. Quite concerning