Thread

1. These are not mutually exclusive, not any more than DNS and IPv6 are. Your protocol should support MNS and Pkarr/Npubs ... One for throwaway accounts and one for stable identity. In fact Nostr already have Nip05 ... I just want to make that sovereign. 2. You touched on one of the two main problems my design needs to address. But it is actually the simplest of the two; you make it computationally expensive to create these Names, just enough so that a user can do it once with ease, but millions of bots break the bank, and you have trillion names so even millions of bots won't saturate it. I will share the actual details once I have working prototype instead of just making promises.

Replies (2)

1. Ok, I understand now. It's a NIP-05 improvement making it sovereign. 👍 I dislike NIP-05, though. Some people misunderstood it as the identity itself, when it really is a DNS alias for the npub, as in nostr the identity lies on the keys. I think it's more dangerous than useful, tbh. 2. Ok, PoW then. 🤙 Looking forward to read the details! Thanks for your answers. 🫂