Thread

Replies (95)

i canโ€™t accept. how do u see a whole bitcoin? i really wanna know. or lets just do-away with 100,000,000 altogether? asking it only feels like restart for those who didnโ€™t buy bitcoin at a dollar. OR u must be thinking a dollar is a dollar whether its 100 thousand or just 2. shouldnโ€™t change names just because we want fractionalize it. damn u got me thinking. i donโ€™t wanna like it so stop. lol.
Except they're not Bitcoins. Lemme ask you is there $100 in 1 Dollar? Sats are the standard. Change it back and keep this train going. No one asked for this. No one uses this. Just you. You just unilaterally decided it. I'm not saying you don't have the right. It's your company. By all means do as you please. But this is confusing as hell and does not clarify or distinguish anything.
It also has the advantage of being in the available unicode set on most machines (because it's a symbol for the Thai Baht, which curiously is divided into 100 "satang"...) The original โ‚ฟ started off as an appropriation of the เธฟ until a proposal was accepted to add โ‚ฟ to unicode: So we'd just be repeating this process for the lowercase for sats :)
This whole discussion on 'are those fractions of a bitcoin called bits, sats or just bitcoin' I get it for the newbies, 'Satoshi's are cents?' hmm. 'Is is not some other crypto coin?' Bits sounds most sensible to me and sats feels nostalgic, but bitcoins? ๐Ÿคจ I image only some whale hodler some day might by accident send me 2000 bitcoin thinking its 2000 sats/bits. Wouldn't that be horrible.
So back to cents for its sounds a bit like sats and whenever those smaller units come into play we call then 'naks' from Nakamoto. Or is there any nice bit(there it is again) of the name Nakamoto to take that flows well, sounds fitting for the world to use? Nakas, moto, kamotos? In a century a coffee may be 20 naks, a night out with the misses, some 5 star wine and dine makes you spend 1 sat and 300 kamotos?