Thread

Replies (31)

In the face of "it should be sats!, no it should be bits!, bleghh", you can just do shit. And honestly, I don't think it matters. Either you know and you adapt to it, or you don't know but it's all relative so who cares. When merchants start to compare notes and they're using different units, they'll learn. It ain't hard.
It's a tricky one. There have been community efforts to design a Sats symbol for 10 years, and we’re no closer today. Sometimes communities just can’t agree. Not only that but even if one option emerged as the clear leader in the next 5 years it might still take another 5 years after that to get it into Unicode. Problem is what happens when the POS systems need a symbol now, can't wait? image
If sat is somehow too confusing because people don't understand that currencies have smaller units (what are these "CENTS"; my bank account only has US Dollars!), then perhaps at LEAST using the linguistically accurate "nanobit" (nBTC) is the middle way, as nano- refers to 1/100,000,000 of something. As for the KYC regulations, who I am is "nano" yo business :-). No solid symbol for nanobits yet.