Thread

🛡️
⚡🔎 NEW - This has to be one of the craziest emails from the Epstein files: "I found criteria to find smart people. The more Jew you are the smarter you. You said you're 98% Jew. You're very smart. My ex boss is 78% Jew. He is super smart, less smart than you are. I have a close friend/business partner who is 99.3% Jew. He is crazily smart. We take all Jewish people, sourcing can be done through relatives. Ask them to do 23&me test. Do event for everyone who is 98% Jew. Also all of them are not religious." image

Replies (9)

There is unfortunately a fundamental flaw in that plan. Although Jews tend to be in the upper percentiles for IQ, they also tend to be in the upper percentiles for neuroticism as well as behavior I can only describe as chaos. Chaos isn't necessarily bad. In fact it is essential up to a point. Jazz wouldn't be Jazz without a chaotic element. Chaos is creative and spontaneous. Adaptive and evolving. This is why the trickster archetype is neither good nor evil, because the trickster represent the chaotic element in all things. The problem with the trickster is that they cannot help themselves and eventually take things too far, and destructive / painful consequences follow. The trickster needs to be managed for their own good and the good of everyone around them. And of course, the trickster by nature will always be working to slip the very control system set up to protect them. And this is the fatal flaw in the plan IMO. Stacking a team with tricksters is doomed to a serious crash and burn eventually. There needs to be balance. Most people here in the technology sector have likely experienced working with a tech diva right? Having one or two on a team really gets things moving. But things quickly deteriorate when too many divas are working together. Same deal here. The key is balance emerging from dynamic tension between elements performing their various overlapping functions.
↩ replying to D3in
Well yes there is inbreeding. Quite a lot of it is well documented in the old testament. But I think that is a separate issue based on a different set of foundational objectives. A side effect of which may very well have resulted in the rise of the jester. Just like breeding sheep or goats in a methodical way gives rise to a specific breed.