Thread

No, we can have a discussion about it just like any rational person should.

I think us, the users, should use hashtags and call out #bullshit or #spam or #spammmy or #liar or #fraudster depending on what we, again, the users, think. reputations will be made or killed based on replies. I posted a note of similar notions earlier this week. check it out. #smij #zapd

Critical thinking and humility must be learned. Someone doing that for you is not freedom. Freedom demands responsibility. The correct course of action was to see if the warning appears for themselves, then potentially confront @miljan directly for an answer to get his side, and *then* to decide an opinion. Just my two cents. Community notes is just another form of only hearing one side.

Probably up to the clients to find a way to do anything with it. More report options for stuff like this and clients can do what they want with the info. I see there isn’t any way to report stuff like this in either Nostur or Damus, for example. Closest thing is spam. @jb55 @Damus

Reputation system for users would be enough. And to prevent bots to spam positive reputation, we can count only votes by peple we follow.

I am quite sure this is fake news as well, however look how well we all handled it without big brother telling us how to :)

Don't be stupid. Just don't trust anything else or check it by yourself. That's darn simple. No need the "Community Notes" or shits, cause bots could misuse it anyway (Noting Nostr protocol was easy) View quoted note →

community notes on nostr could be based on people you follow votes (helpful or not)