Gloria Zhao is anti-Bitcoin maximalism and pro-NTF spam. She is a spam shitcoiner.
Core devs are compromised. Adam Back is compromised. All of them are spammer cucks to the bad actors like Jameson Slopp, Shinobi, shitcoinmagazine, Casey Rodarmor, Citrea and Chainway shitcoiners lab and and so on. Shitcoiners really likes Core v30 π©π©π©
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (12)
If that ditzy whore can fuck her way into destroying Bitcoin, then Bitcoin was worthless to begin with.
Core is worhtless.
There is huge difference.
Bitcoin is THE Global Most Secure Decentralized Unconfiscatable Peer-to-Peer Scarce Hard Sovereign Freedom Money, The Greatest Store of Value and The Strongest Hope for Humanity.
Well if that's true, then let's start trying some knots.
Here some of the shitcoiners who like and run Core v30 ... π©π©π©
pay attention to the people who ignore this like its nothing, tells you more than what this simpleton actually tries to say....
The core dev team has clearly been coopted.
When things donβt add up over and over itβs because youβre being gaslit.
βsilly strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam
βad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate.
Spend a few minutes listening to Mechanic @npub1wnlu...n3wr debating op_return and youβll clearly see whoβs speaking truthfully.
ππ»π§‘π»
View quoted note β
Core is blatantly spitting in our faces begging for a chain split. It will be important not to make any sudden changes until we know their strategy. Because of this I think the BIP-444 "Temporary Softfork" idea is brilliant. Gives us time to build Knots and Ocean adoption while watching for Core's next moves.
If only there was a private decentralized cryptocurrency that incentivized the miners to protect the monetary transactions, and their transmission of value instead of adding unnecessary data into the blockchain π€.
If only, if only...
Nothing stops greed. Spam money would be on top of what they get.
We are attacked from inside. You are not immune to such attacks either.
But we still have means to protect Bitcoin.
More, or less but so far.
Bitcoin's core team have not acted in the best interests of the project.
Monero's potentially compromised contributors have stepped down, and updates require a community consensus.
Not saying it's perfect but Monero seems to have less compromised devs, and has more mechanisms to ensure compromised devs don't have total control.
Monero already had The Op_Return (TX_Extra) debate, and TX_Extra was reduced to counteract ordinals on Monero
So far between the two it seems like Monero has the better record for now.
But I'd like to hear the suggestions to counteract these problems in Bitcoin, so hopefully it can also be saved.
ππ