Let’s do a quick thought experiment. Imagine a government becomes opposed to how certain people are using Bitcoin. In response, it establishes its own Bitcoin node software, launches a mining pool, and introduces a soft fork—claiming that anyone who resists this fork is supporting illegal activity. Would you support this soft fork?
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (12)
What would you do with your node if even one CP gets into opreturn? This is a sincere question.
That's a tough one.
First, let me state that I will never upgrade to v30. I'll keep my old node has long as it works. If need be, I'll switch to whatever other implementation is possible at that time.
Second, if the kind of content you mentioned makes it into op_return, I think I will :
1. make my node private,
2. have a new node that will be pruned to keep as little data as possible and have that be the public-facing node (again, as long as it's a previous version of Core or it's Knots), and
3. configure my private node (1) to only connect to my pruned node.
I might also consider a satellite node, so it never connects to anyone else.
Hopefully, some third implementation comes along.
If the kind of bad content you mentioned makes it into op_return and if neither older versions of Core nor Knots work, and if we don't get a third implementation, I'll stop running a node.
That the Core team got it that bad, and then doubled-down, really shook my faith in the project. I felt spiritual clarity during the blocksize war and the bcash fork. This is different. That both Greg Maxwell and Adam Back seem to have lost the plot is very concerning.
I never trusted Newberry since I saw him drop a pen during a presentation and not pick it up again. Someone who is not autistic enough to feel like he must pick up the pen that he dropped, shouldn't be touching the code for the monetary system of all of humanity. I also don't trust his underlings.
I still want to believe that bitcoin is "manifest destiny", that Bitcoin is destined to be humanity's best weapon against the dystopia that the Parasites are pushing on us. That bitcoin is the fire from Prometheus. I used to feel that, but with these events, this belief has been shaken and is now only a hope.
@ODELL @BTC Sessions
#bitcoin #btc #node #core #knots
What if it’s only “temporary,” though…? 😬
When govt says “temporary” 🫣
Let’s do a quick thought experiment. Imagine a government wants to attack Bitcoin. What could they do?
They can compromised a number of developers. The developers could start slowly degrading Bitcoin.
They could change the definition of Bitcoin being "digital currency that uses peer-to-peer technology" to just be a "peer-to-peer network".
They could change the definition of the datacarriersize.
Using that as argument they could deny fixing the inscriptions spam.
Then they could use the inscriptions spam as an argument that spam is unstoppable so they better blow up OP_RETURN and invite even more spam.
Just like BSV did after which someone uploaded CSAM to the BSV blockchain.


F the DS.
This will happen. Then it is your choice to stay or go.
Obvious once you see it.
No, I would not. Now, let's do another thought experiment:
Imagine the Core team decides to radically change bitcoin into a piece of software that openly states that it welcomes any non-monetary-transaction-content, legal or illegal, and will relay it. They decide to call it v30.
Would you run v30? Is that the hill you choose?
**** This just in.. pedoland under 'pedo software' "crisis" ****
The U.S. is the only UN member state that has not yet ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
As of July 2025, child marriage is legal in 34 states.