Let's see:
All Bitcoin developers or people close to Bitcoin who appear in Epstein's papers:
- Have contributed to legitimizing chain spam and attempting to erase the essence of Bitcoin, which is peer-to-peer money transfer.
- Have contributed to the development and adoption of stablecoins.
- Have contributed to creating shitcoins or creating chains that support shitcoins.
Don't give me that crap, you're defending the indefensible, many of you are fucking bootlickers.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (13)
Seems pretty damning. Quite high probability too. You got attestations or would it be easier for me to go Google?
I could go through them one by one, but the most relevant case is Blockstream. Clearly, all of its developers support spam, and Liquid, from being a Bitcoin sidechain, has transformed into a chain that supports stablecoins and shitcoins.
Thank you for your reporting, Cypher. π€π€

I realize this is a serious issue. I just had to relieve it with some humor imagining those guys like this.
In the interest of being the change I want to see in the world, I am staying humble and spending bitcoin daily, wherever possible, which is very often @Bitcoin Jungle in Costa Rica. It is all I can do. And that is enough. I encourage others to participate in circular economies! PV
Which persons are involved?
So far Iβve seen Adam Back, Matt Corallo, Bryan Bishop, Vladimir van der Laan, Gavin Andresen. There are probably more.
Has anyone fed the papers to an ai yet?
sos/diff.day @Cyph3rp9nk

woundn't even show in my timeline/been fading notes like this for years now/nostr
