Thread

Replies (43)

🛡️
Which mint to trust is the same as “trusting” which Bitcoin hot wallet or hardware to use—assuming you’re a regular pleb who isn’t versed enough to verify open-source code or hardware. It’s a mix of rating, recommendations, and trust built on proof of work. I really like Minibits and Coinos Mint, and that’s what I recommend. Calle has this project where it would use donation sats to move money between mints to constantly probe their liquidity.
I think people are using in the wrong way these public cashu mints. A good example of using cashu mint is @Cuba ₿itcoin. They created a local community mint and promote it around their merchants and users. That add a good trust level and communication between users. I think this is the main utility for a cashu mint. If you do not have a local community mint, and you have to use a random public one, then better use these lists and choose wisely: - - Use them with small amounts and do not keep everything in just one mint. I hope soon we will have multi-mint spending so will be easier to manage multiple mints. Don't abuse these mints! I've seen people using them as coinjoin services... that's wrong. Moving around large amounts of sats through mints you are disrupting their liquidity with unnecessary transactions. Behind every mint is a LN node. Not all have a good management of liquidity and you will encounter problems, stuck funds, lost keys etc. People must understand how mint tokens works, are not just some papers where it says "IOU x sats"... are more than that and are many technical details that cashu devs didn't explained to the end user so well. So do your own research and read how these cashu tokens works.
And that is a wrong approach. I strongly encourage all knowledgeable bitcoiners to start building these local communities, being a local "LN bank" and "local cashu mint". I wrote some guides about these aspects: 1. 2. Take the example of the @npub1kj4r...65u0 brazilian community https://www.lnvoltz.xyz/en/brln-academy BE THE CHANGE IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE CHANGE IN THIS FUCKED UP WORLD
With regard to using a random public mint, personally, I wouldn't even bother with multiple mints. The "small amounts" rule is sufficient mitigation in my book. I recently learned that mints will effectively invalidate tokens that have been dormant for a while, by design, in order to clear out tokens that are presumed abandoned and keep their database of outstanding tokens manageable (or maybe other reasons as well? 🤷‍♂️) What constitutes "dormant for a while" may be years, or it may be weeks, or it may be whatever. Presumedly, that policy is up to each individual mint. For this reason, I think trying to manage "small amounts" of tokens across multiple mints is bound to be more trouble than it's worth.
False, Dan is a real one. He’s tests a ton of new wallets and software. Helps run and support or of the largest group of node operators I’ve found, for free. He’s told you where he actually lost Cashu nuts and yet all you can do is still call him a troll wtf? All I can say is if you’re new here, remember: If you Don’t understand and can’t verify. Don’t trust. Keep asking for help. There’s people out there like Dan that can help. Instead of calling you a troll.
no calle. i met him on a sidewalk in nyc and we chatted and he was a good communicator and educator and it was clear as day to me at the time that he cared deeply and was earnestly enthused. as far as im concerned: if he is not an asset no one is. a lot of time, dedication, and hard work.
🛡️
This is a new perspective. I’ve never heard anyone say lightning “sucks ass”. Could you explain your reasoning as to why you’ve come to this conclusion regarding lightning please? What is a better solution than lightning? I personally believe ecash via the Fedimint protocol is an excellent choice. There are tradeoffs to everything. But to say lightning “sucks ass” I’d say is a bit obtuse in your criticism. Lightning may be no good for the implementation you’re looking for…that’s logical. But to say it “sucks ass” (overall) is a narrow viewpoint.