It's short-sighted, to tolerate your government behaving tyrannically toward foreign visitors and residents.
They always test this stuff out on the foreigners, first.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
Meanwhile, the UK censors its own people!? Maybe not the best place to visit or reside anymore.
I don't really understand what the UK is doing. Bizarre.
It will be interesting to see how it evolves.
Thank goodness for Nostr. This is what it was designed for - to maintain free speech.
From Grok:
“By American or classical-liberal definitions of free speech, yes—the UK systematically censors its citizens through a combination of broad speech-crime laws, regulatory pressure on tech companies, and pre-emptive policing of opinion. By continental-European standards, the UK is roughly in the middle of the pack (stricter than Germany on hate speech, less strict than France on religious insult laws post-2021). Compared to most of the Anglosphere (US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), the UK has significantly weaker legal protections for controversial speech.”
Governments have a history of defining natural born citizens as foreigners after they run out of foreigners to persecute.
Just redesignate them "traitors". Also known as "Freiwild".
Please define “behaving tyrannically” so that we know your conclusions aren’t short-sighted.
Wer lesen kann, ist im Vorteil.
AMEN😤, Laeserin
90% of the population will tolerate anything...up to and including getting in the cattle-cars to the gulag - we can't save everyone
My first thought was, how long until they are not going to let people back in after travel?
The government has a responsibility to behave "tyrannically" towards foreign invaders. It's what keeps the native population safe. The insane liberal idea that we shouldn't differentiate is dangerous and the reason why everything is falling apart.
Foreign visitors and residents? Illegals are not exactly in any of those groups.