Thread

FinCEN’s proposal to outlaw all crypto privacy is a huge overreach. They apply a section of the Patriot Act on a “class of transactions” in a new precedent. Doesn’t matter if it’s custodial or noncustodial- merely using certain type of code can be an illegal act. People are caught by the potential spot ETF, meanwhile this is proposed. Now they fight you.

Replies (67)

What would that do? It would cost about 72 billion dollars a year today to cut the tx rate to a tenth of current assuming other miners kept mining. Transactions will still confirm fees will be juicy. Ecash btw on the same mint would be untouched. Would probably explode. Harder for me to say what Lightning would do. And we’d probably see it coming from a mile away because nobody would be able to buy miners for a long time.
Bitcoin and the State (as we know it) can't both survive, especially the US. With suffient hashpower (of the levels that "Soft War" guy are advocating the Pentagon to acquire), mining empty blocks makes Bitcoin completely useless because transactions can't be put into blocks. The State has nuclear power plants and ASIC fabs (ask the NSA). This will not be an easy fight and it could go either way.
🛡️
Reminder that the US government has spent 8 trillion dollars over 20 years on "the war on terror". It's not that Budget isn't relevant. On the contrary, the racket thrives on unlimited spending. 70 billion a year to "fight shady criminal superhackers sponsored by North Korea and Iran"? That's exactly the type of thing they want.
I hear you and that’s a good point. I think I still disagree. 72B still lets 10% of current txs through! 8T every 20 years would only allow them to bring transactions down to ~2% of current rate. Fees would be &$$&, ecash in a given mint would still be free. I suppose the mining industrial complex would lobby for that money, but we wouldn’t have any boys to immortalize for their sacrificed lives. No football stadium flyovers cuz ASICS are boring. Just data centers consuming loads of electricity, creating relatively few jobs, costing tons. There environmentalists would be absolutely extinct over the amount of CO2 or what have you being pumped into the air/earth Maybe I’m wrong about this. Oh, hey, “they” might actually leverage it to finally commercialize fusion 😆
🛡️
I just wanted to bring that up. My personal opinion has always been that the status quo is split between: 1. those who are too old to get on the train like Buffet and that other dinosaur partner of his all will simply be swept aside 2. the ones that even today think they can fight this, like some leftist politicians and academics who realize that Bitcoin is inherently anti-State 3. the ones that realize that Bitcoin is inherently anti-state and instead of fighting it want to coopt it. Like BlackRock and JP Morgan. I think the last faction is destined to win.
We are in the “then they fight you” stage. There are no laws anymore. “Law” is gone. Don’t get hung-up still thinking there are laws. It’s everyone for themselves. The people fighting within the (now) fake Laws, matter very greatly. The people rejecting the (now) fake Laws, matter very greatly. We don’t know our future. It’s never been more uncertain. The time we live in is not a good time for people who need to know how things are supposed to work. But it’s a very good time for those who are whatever the opposite of “Sociopathy” are.
🛡️
Exchanges in the US are already co-opted and their over eager KYC allows the USG to track coins that originate domestically and a weapon against self custodial uses of coins from exchanges. I think this is also is a way to bully offshore banks to not work with local Bitcoin exchanges. The complexity of if a tx does or does not fall afoul of these proposed rules will not be worth the risk of losing access to the US banking system. I still don't think most government regulators realize the peril the state (and their job) is in. These regulations are just the start of them waking up.
Let's face it, if one day any government decides that crypto is illegal, there won’t be absolutely nothing we can do about it. For the moment, the crypto movement is tolerated, but if the feeling of mistrust towards a state, a currency or an institution grows, the tide may turn, and not necessarily in the right direction. It's the "anarchist" side of this ecosystem that displeases institutions, and that's damaging for the BTC project.