It would be really useful to be able to have a max limit on how much any one person's posts shows up in our feed per day. It could select their top N posts for the day or choose them at random. There are some accounts I enjoy, but not enough that they flood out everyone else in my feed.
image
Same logic: "If we don't comply to terrorists' demands, then why do we act surprised when they want to cause violence." There are good reasons to help our fellow Man but this ain't it chief. image
This type of messaging resonates with me way more than what I usually see. I would dabble in Bitcoin but the IRS seems keen on making that a pain in the ass. Plus, I don't want to nark on others who wish to remain anonymous or have them find out I didn't nark when someone else eventually narks on me. View Article →
Provisions to help limit the federal government per Michael Huemer: 1. Supermajority rules: New laws should necessitate a 2/3 majority vote for passage. A presumption against coercion needs to be overcome. Slightly over 50% on contentious issues doesn't overcome this presumption. 2. Negative legislature: Introduce a separate legislative body, elected by popular vote, that only has the power to find and eliminate unnecessary and legislation. 3. Constitutional court: Establish a dedicated court to enforce the Constitution, accompanied by a special prosecutor's office for pursuing potentially unconstitutional government actions. These cases should be decided by juries of ordinary citizens to avoid pro-government bias. 4. Accountability for constitutional violations: The Constitutional Court should have the power to impose penalties on government officials who violate the Constitution, including fines, removal from office, and even imprisonment.
Groups are most responsive and malleable after a disaster. Right now is the best time for libertarians, classical liberals, and moderates to influence the democrats. And there is unfathomable room for improvement.