Nonya "Fucking Bitch" Bidniss

Oh myyyy

The Standard

Hospital evacuated as 'man found to have WW1 artillery shell in rectum'

The discovery of the century-old shell prompted a hospital evacuation amid fears it could explode

Killers of Alex Pretti identified, published by ProPublica

ProPublica

Two CBP Agents Identified in Alex Pretti Shooting

The two federal immigration agents who fired on Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti are identified in government records as Border Patrol agent Jesus...

#RIP Catherine O'Hara. She was 71.

Again, reminder, it was CBP that killed Alex Pretti. "Abolish ICE" fails to deal with half the Trump brownshirts, who are btw operating outside their legal 100-mile from the border zone as they participate in crimes against Americans and non-citizens alike. Abolish **DHS**!

Statement from Matt Moberg, Chaplain of the Minnesota Timberwolves

NBC News: DHS has shot 12 people during immigration enforcement operations since September:

The U.S. has entered the Dual State condition described by Ernst Fraenkel > When a government kills dissidents and signals that the killers are beyond the reach of the law, legitimacy is no longer a property of the system. It is a hollow performance staged for a shrinking audience. The notion that these masked enforcers are legitimate law enforcement is a fiction. They are paramilitary operatives. They are thugs in the service of a regime. > **The Linguistic Front** > Linguistic secession is no longer a matter of rhetorical preference; it is a moral and political necessity. Authoritarianism survives on the oxygen of recognition, requiring that we continue to use the honorifics and vocabulary of the old democracy to mask the reality of the new autocracy. To continue calling the shooters in Minneapolis “law enforcement officers” is not a professional courtesy; it is an act of collaboration that validates the lie that power still flows from the consent of the governed. Every time we use the state’s preferred titles, we surrender a piece of the reality we inhabit. We must instead strip the regime of the linguistic cover that allows it to operate under the guise of the law.

In Trump's 'Dual State,' Dissenters Face Extrajudicial Executions, Loyalists Enjoy Protections

America's system of justice has fundamentally broken because the regime believes it can justify attacks on citizens via lies rather than in a court...

“There is no such thing as liberalism — or progressivism, etc. There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation. There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: *There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.* There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. For millennia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual. As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence. So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone. Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or “progressivism”, or “socialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism. No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get: ***The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.”*** ― Frank Wilhoit